Re: Coverity Scan

[David Stacey <drstacey@tiscali.co.uk>]

On 25/04/14 09:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>   There are some conditions associated with using Coverity Scan [2]. The
>>   one thing that jumps out is that our relationship with RedHat might be
>>   a stumbling block. We can but ask - the worst that can happen is that
>>   they politely decline.
> They will.  #7 won't fly due to the buyout license clause.

Would you like me to enquire anyway?

>
>>   There have been a few hints on this list about a possible move from CVS
>>   to git. If such a move were on the cards then that should probably
>>   happen first - I wouldn't want the nugatory effort of getting this
>>   working from CVS only to have to change it almost immediately.
> Yeah, I'm n ot exactly looking forward to it since I'm very familiar
> with CVS or SVN, but have nothing but trouble with git.  But since
> everybody else is so very happy with git, I guess I'll have to adapt.
> Teeth-gnashingly.

It might help ease your pain knowing that you can use github with a svn 
client (to a limited extent):
https://help.github.com/articles/support-for-subversion-clients

Dave.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple