public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-5.2.0-1 (Test x86/x86_64)
@ 2015-09-30 15:51 JonY
  2015-10-05 18:54 ` Ken Brown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: JonY @ 2015-09-30 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 730 bytes --]


gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.

This is the first series of the 5.x releases, and should be considered
as experimental as such.

              *** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO ***

If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look
at the "List-Unsubscribe: " tag in the email header of this message.
Send email to the address specified there. It will be in the format:

cygwin-announce-unsubscribe-you=yourdomain.com <at> cygwin.com

If you need more information on unsubscribing, start reading here:

http://sourceware.org/lists.html#unsubscribe-simple

Please read *all* of the information on unsubscribing that is available
starting at this URL.





[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-5.2.0-1 (Test x86/x86_64)
  2015-09-30 15:51 [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-5.2.0-1 (Test x86/x86_64) JonY
@ 2015-10-05 18:54 ` Ken Brown
  2015-10-06 10:38   ` JonY
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ken Brown @ 2015-10-05 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On 9/30/2015 7:15 AM, JonY wrote:
>
> gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
>
> This is the first series of the 5.x releases, and should be considered
> as experimental as such.

Just a HEADSUP for package maintainers who might want to try this: I 
installed this by clicking the Exp button in setup and choosing 
everything that seemed related to gcc.  This included binutils-2.25-2. 
It turns out that this test release is *not* related to the gcc-5 
release, and it has bugs that caused me problems.  So stick with 
binutils-2.25-1.

[JonY, I can report the binutils-2.25-2 bug separately if you want 
details.  Briefly, I got errors when running 'nm -l' on some DLLs, on 
x86 only.]

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-5.2.0-1 (Test x86/x86_64)
  2015-10-05 18:54 ` Ken Brown
@ 2015-10-06 10:38   ` JonY
  2015-10-06 13:14     ` Ken Brown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: JonY @ 2015-10-06 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1020 bytes --]

On 10/6/2015 02:54, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 9/30/2015 7:15 AM, JonY wrote:
>>
>> gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
>>
>> This is the first series of the 5.x releases, and should be considered
>> as experimental as such.
> 
> Just a HEADSUP for package maintainers who might want to try this: I
> installed this by clicking the Exp button in setup and choosing
> everything that seemed related to gcc.  This included binutils-2.25-2.
> It turns out that this test release is *not* related to the gcc-5
> release, and it has bugs that caused me problems.  So stick with
> binutils-2.25-1.
> 
> [JonY, I can report the binutils-2.25-2 bug separately if you want
> details.  Briefly, I got errors when running 'nm -l' on some DLLs, on
> x86 only.]
> 

Yes, I am aware that something weird is going on in the x86 binutils but
can't seem to pin it down anywhere. gcc builds hang when using the new
nm (or perhaps build very very slowly).

I'd be interested on your findings.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-5.2.0-1 (Test x86/x86_64)
  2015-10-06 10:38   ` JonY
@ 2015-10-06 13:14     ` Ken Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ken Brown @ 2015-10-06 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On 10/6/2015 6:38 AM, JonY wrote:
> Yes, I am aware that something weird is going on in the x86 binutils but
> can't seem to pin it down anywhere. gcc builds hang when using the new
> nm (or perhaps build very very slowly).
>
> I'd be interested on your findings.

OK, I've started a new thread for this, since it doesn't seem to be 
related to gcc-5:

   https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-10/msg00060.html

Ken


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-06 13:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-30 15:51 [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-5.2.0-1 (Test x86/x86_64) JonY
2015-10-05 18:54 ` Ken Brown
2015-10-06 10:38   ` JonY
2015-10-06 13:14     ` Ken Brown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).