From: David Allsopp <David.Allsopp@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: Cygwin setup writing incorrect symlinks for native
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:03:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5738faa0199943b99d8d6a0d2da71ed5@metastack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d1a8071-76f7-b634-b4ce-07ce6c18a8d9@dronecode.org.uk>
Jon Turney wrote:
> On 09/01/2022 09:35, David Allsopp wrote:
> > Jon Turney wrote:
> >> On 06/01/2022 16:45, David Allsopp wrote:
> >>> Jon Turney wrote:
> >>>> On 06/01/2022 10:46, David Allsopp wrote:
> >>>>> Running Cygwin setup 2.912 with --symlink-type native (or
> >>>>> CYGWIN=winsymlinks:native) is not correctly translating all
> symlinks.
> >>>>> A default install has these faulty ones:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /etc/pki/tls/cert.pem ->
> >>>>> \??\/etc\pki\ca-trust\extracted\pem\tls-ca-bundle.pem
> >>>>> /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt ->
> >>>>> \??\/etc\pki\ca-trust\extracted\pem\tls-ca-bundle.pem
> >>>>> /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.trust.crt ->
> >>>>> \??\/etc\pki\ca-trust\extracted\openssl\ca-bundle.trust.crt
> >>>>> /etc/ssl/certs -> \??\/etc\pki\tls\certs /lib/security/cacerts ->
> >>>>> \??\/etc\pki\ca-trust\extracted\java\cacerts
> >>>>> /usr/share/doc/groff-1.22.4/pdf/mom-pdf.pdf ->
> >>>>> \??\/usr\share\doc\groff-1.22.4\examples\mom\mom-pdf.pdf
> >>>>
> >>>>
> [...]
> >>
> >> Thanks for testing. It seems I still didn't have this quite right
> >> and these symlinks just happened to work for cygwin, but not native
> tools.
> >>
> >> Please try
> >>
> >> https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.914.x86_64.exe
> >> https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.914.x86.exe
> >
> > I'm afraid that's just changed the \??\ to \\?\ on those symlinks.
>
> Well, that has the advantage of being correct :)
>
> (since it's the 'Win32 File Namespace' prefix, which
> CreateSymbolicLinkW() is documented to accept for the target filename, and
> is required when that exceeds MAX_PATH (260) characters)
>
> In my (brief) testing, e.g. the CMD builtin 'type' is able to open
> symlinks of this form. However, it seems there are some parts of Windows
> (e.g. DIR, File Explorer), which don't handle symlinks like that well.
>
> So, I've copied the behaviour of the cygwin DLL, which avoids using that
> prefix if the target is less than MAX_PATH characters. This seem to work
> better in those cases with typical paths (but I'd claim we're just working
> around a bug in Windows here, as things will still be broken if the cygwin
> root is a path long enough that we can't do that).
>
> Please try:
>
> https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.915.x86_64.exe
> https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.915.x86.exe
That's working (for cmd as well), thanks!
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-12 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-06 10:46 David Allsopp
2022-01-06 16:05 ` Jon Turney
2022-01-06 16:45 ` David Allsopp
2022-01-07 15:44 ` Jon Turney
2022-01-09 9:35 ` David Allsopp
2022-01-10 15:39 ` Jon Turney
2022-01-12 16:03 ` David Allsopp [this message]
2022-01-12 16:18 ` Jon Turney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5738faa0199943b99d8d6a0d2da71ed5@metastack.com \
--to=david.allsopp@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).