public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <lhallobi@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libreadline7-7.0.1-1, libreadline-devel-7.0.1-1, bash-4.4.5-1
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 05:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <587EF6ED.6010008@cygwin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ1FpuM-J9rMXQUp09vRLqxPZb+d82Neb-nxRxsw9FKT3gzJdg@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/17/2017 11:09 PM, Doug Henderson wrote:
> On 17 January 2017 at 20:55, Steven Penny  wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 20:08:17, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> [again, your email client likes to break threading, so I nearly missed
>>> this one]
>>
>> Sorry about that, I wrote my own client so that I could reply without
>> subscribing:
>
> I find it despicable that you want us to participating in solving a
> problem you encountered, but seem unwilling to subscribe so you can
> participate in solving problems that the rest of us encounter.
>
> I feel that you are using false pretenses to use our time to think
> about your problem and offer solutions, if we can, without
> reciprocating.
>
> Shame on you.

Whoa!  While I agree there has been some very negatively charged comments
coming from Steven in this thread, I don't think we need to start finding
fault with everything he says and does relative to it.  It's perfectly
fine for him, or anyone else for that matter, to monitor a thread or this
list in whatever form works for them.  In this case, Steven corrected the
problem when it was pointed out to him that his method was breaking
threading.  That's a perfectly acceptable response and all we can ask of
him in that regard.  There's no need to go looking for fault in that.

Let's try to keep this thread productive and moving forward.  While I
would say, in my estimation, it got off to a rocky start, I think the
recent exchange between Steven and Eric has done allot to track the
problem and to scale back the negative comments.  Let's try to keep the
thread moving forward on both fronts.


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-18  5:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-03 16:55 Eric Blake (cygwin)
2017-01-13  5:07 ` Steven Penny
2017-01-13 14:47   ` Eric Blake
2017-01-14  0:23     ` Steven Penny
2017-01-14 21:48       ` Eric Blake
2017-01-15  0:27         ` Steven Penny
2017-01-15 13:23           ` Vince Rice
2017-01-15 14:11             ` cyg Simple
2017-01-15 14:30               ` Steven Penny
2017-01-16 10:32                 ` Yaakov Selkowitz
2017-01-16 12:40                   ` Steven Penny
2017-01-15 22:33         ` Thomas Wolff
2017-01-16  0:45           ` Steven Penny
2017-01-16  0:54             ` Steven Penny
2017-01-17  2:47         ` Steven Penny
2017-01-17  3:32           ` Steven Penny
2017-01-18  0:36             ` Steven Penny
2017-01-18  2:08               ` Eric Blake
2017-01-18  3:55                 ` Steven Penny
2017-01-18  4:09                   ` Doug Henderson
2017-01-18  5:02                     ` Larry Hall (Cygwin) [this message]
2017-01-18  5:45                       ` Steven Penny
2017-01-19  5:23                         ` Steven Penny
2017-01-19 13:23                           ` Eliot Moss
2017-01-19 14:21                             ` Eric Blake
2017-01-19 18:13                               ` Corinna Vinschen
2017-01-19 23:54                                 ` Steven Penny
2017-01-20 13:04                                   ` Corinna Vinschen
2017-01-20 14:51                           ` Eric Blake
2017-01-20 15:00                             ` Eric Blake
2017-01-21  3:57                               ` Steven Penny
2017-01-18  1:46     ` Eric Blake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=587EF6ED.6010008@cygwin.com \
    --to=lhallobi@gmail.com \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).