public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* older version of cvs in Cygwin?
       [not found] <2146870425.1120693.1472887755339.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
@ 2016-09-03  7:29 ` lloyd.wood
  2016-09-03 14:17   ` Marco Atzeri
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: lloyd.wood @ 2016-09-03  7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

In Cygwin's supplied cvs package:

$ cvs --version 

Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11.23 (client/server)


Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 

[..]

This seems to be an older version of cvs, and SourceForge's cvs server won't always interoperate with it to do e.g. the cvs remove command. Choices to install are 1.11.23-2 and the older 1.11.22-1.

Later versions of cvs don't have this problem. Oddly, the later versions of cvs I have access to on other systems have a later version number but an earlier copyright year... 2005 vs 2006.

(ubuntu linux)
lloyd@lloyd-ubuntu-14-64:~$ cvs --version 

Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.12.13-MirDebian-11 (client/server)


Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.


(mac os x snow leopard)
$ cvs --version 

Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.12.13 (client/server)

Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.


Can the cvs package in cygwin be updated?

thanks

Lloyd Wood
http://savi.sf.net/

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: older version of cvs in Cygwin?
  2016-09-03  7:29 ` older version of cvs in Cygwin? lloyd.wood
@ 2016-09-03 14:17   ` Marco Atzeri
  2016-09-03 18:58     ` Hans-Bernhard Bröker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marco Atzeri @ 2016-09-03 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On 03/09/2016 09:29, lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> In Cygwin's supplied cvs package:
>
> $ cvs --version
>
> Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11.23 (client/server)
> Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> [..]
>
> This seems to be an older version of cvs, and SourceForge's cvs server won't always interoperate with it to do e.g. the cvs remove command. Choices to install are 1.11.23-2 and the older 1.11.22-1.

It is the last released

https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-07/msg00054.html

>
> thanks
>
> Lloyd Wood
> http://savi.sf.net/


Which problem do you have ?
May be you need to define CVS_RSH=ssh ?

Regards
Marco



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: older version of cvs in Cygwin?
  2016-09-03 14:17   ` Marco Atzeri
@ 2016-09-03 18:58     ` Hans-Bernhard Bröker
  2016-09-03 21:06       ` Marco Atzeri
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans-Bernhard Bröker @ 2016-09-03 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

Am 03.09.2016 um 16:17 schrieb Marco Atzeri:

>> This seems to be an older version of cvs, and SourceForge's cvs server
>> won't always interoperate with it to do e.g. the cvs remove command.
>> Choices to install are 1.11.23-2 and the older 1.11.22-1.
>
> It is the last released
>
> https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-07/msg00054.html

Well, not exactly.  CVS has both a "stable" and a "feature" branch.

Stable release 1.11.23 is the most recent, but feature release 1.12.13, 
while about 3 years older, has several features that never made it into 
'stable'.  Cygwin-32bit used to have the latter, but it was, well, 
'side-graded' to the former because of a problem discussed in the 
above-mentioned email thread.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: older version of cvs in Cygwin?
  2016-09-03 18:58     ` Hans-Bernhard Bröker
@ 2016-09-03 21:06       ` Marco Atzeri
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marco Atzeri @ 2016-09-03 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On 03/09/2016 20:58, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
> Am 03.09.2016 um 16:17 schrieb Marco Atzeri:
>
>>> This seems to be an older version of cvs, and SourceForge's cvs server
>>> won't always interoperate with it to do e.g. the cvs remove command.
>>> Choices to install are 1.11.23-2 and the older 1.11.22-1.
>>
>> It is the last released
>>
>> https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-07/msg00054.html
>
> Well, not exactly.  CVS has both a "stable" and a "feature" branch.
>
> Stable release 1.11.23 is the most recent, but feature release 1.12.13,
> while about 3 years older,

last as temporal release.

stable  1.11.23 was released on May 2008
feature 1.12.13 was released on Oct 2005

I stick on the most recent and less buggy ;-)

CVS is basically dead, and the usage of any other
source version control is strongly recommended.

Tschüs
Marco






--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-03 21:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <2146870425.1120693.1472887755339.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2016-09-03  7:29 ` older version of cvs in Cygwin? lloyd.wood
2016-09-03 14:17   ` Marco Atzeri
2016-09-03 18:58     ` Hans-Bernhard Bröker
2016-09-03 21:06       ` Marco Atzeri

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).