* setup-x86_64.exe 2.884 vs. setup.ini 2.891
@ 2018-04-29 20:38 Keith Thompson
2018-04-29 21:22 ` Steven Penny
2018-05-02 6:48 ` Keith Thompson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keith Thompson @ 2018-04-29 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin; +Cc: Keith Thompson
I'm using a freshly downloaded copy of https://cygwin.com/setup-x86_64.exe,
which reports itself to be "Setup.exe version 2.884 (64 bit)".
I use http://mirrors.kernel.org
Every time I run the setup program, it reports:
Cygwin Setup
The current ini file is from a newer version of setup-x86_64.exe. If you
have any trouble installing, please download a fresh version from
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-x86_64.exe.
I've confirmed that the ini file at
http://mirrors.kernel.org/sourceware/cygwin/x86_64/setup.ini
contains:
release: cygwin
arch: x86_64
setup-timestamp: 1524946592
setup-version: 2.891
I was able to find https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.891.x86_64.exe via
a Google search, which works around the problem, but the underlying
problem is still there: the default setup program is inconsistent
with the setup.ini files on the mirrors.
I've been having this problem for several weeks (I don't know exactly
when it started). I've checked several other mirror sites, and the
setup.ini for all the ones I've checked also specify version 2.891.
If I ignore the warning messages, the discrepancy doesn't seem to
cause any problems.
I'm using Windows 10.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: setup-x86_64.exe 2.884 vs. setup.ini 2.891
2018-04-29 20:38 setup-x86_64.exe 2.884 vs. setup.ini 2.891 Keith Thompson
@ 2018-04-29 21:22 ` Steven Penny
2018-05-02 6:48 ` Keith Thompson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Penny @ 2018-04-29 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:38:04, Keith Thompson wrote:
> I'm using a freshly downloaded copy of https://cygwin.com/setup-x86_64.exe,
> which reports itself to be "Setup.exe version 2.884 (64 bit)".
You sure about that?
$ curl -O cygwin.com/setup-x86_64.exe
$ ./setup-x86_64 -V
Cygwin setup 2.891
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: setup-x86_64.exe 2.884 vs. setup.ini 2.891
2018-04-29 20:38 setup-x86_64.exe 2.884 vs. setup.ini 2.891 Keith Thompson
2018-04-29 21:22 ` Steven Penny
@ 2018-05-02 6:48 ` Keith Thompson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keith Thompson @ 2018-05-02 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin; +Cc: Keith Thompson
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Keith Thompson
<Keith.S.Thompson@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm using a freshly downloaded copy of https://cygwin.com/setup-x86_64.exe,
> which reports itself to be "Setup.exe version 2.884 (64 bit)".
No, I wasn't. I had the correct version in the directory where I
*thought* I was running it from, but the Start menu found a different
and older copy (in my Downloads directory).
<emily_litella>Never mind.</emily_litella>
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-02 6:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-04-29 20:38 setup-x86_64.exe 2.884 vs. setup.ini 2.891 Keith Thompson
2018-04-29 21:22 ` Steven Penny
2018-05-02 6:48 ` Keith Thompson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).