* type mismatch on cpuset.h
@ 2023-03-06 6:57 Marco Atzeri
2023-03-06 8:55 ` Corinna Vinschen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marco Atzeri @ 2023-03-06 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Hi,
building latest gdal I noticed a type mismatch, that forced me to build
with "-fpermissive"
on /usr/include/sys/cpuset.h
#define CPU_ALLOC(num) __builtin_malloc (CPU_ALLOC_SIZE(num))
but on
https://linux.die.net/man/3/cpu_alloc
cpu_set_t *CPU_ALLOC(int num_cpus)
so void* versus cpu_set_t*
I have not checked if the other definitions are correct.
Regard
Marco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: type mismatch on cpuset.h
2023-03-06 6:57 type mismatch on cpuset.h Marco Atzeri
@ 2023-03-06 8:55 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-03-06 9:14 ` Mark Geisert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Corinna Vinschen @ 2023-03-06 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Geisert; +Cc: Marco Atzeri, cygwin
Hi Mark,
On Mar 6 07:57, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> building latest gdal I noticed a type mismatch, that forced me to build
> with "-fpermissive"
>
> on /usr/include/sys/cpuset.h
>
> #define CPU_ALLOC(num) __builtin_malloc (CPU_ALLOC_SIZE(num))
>
>
> but on
> https://linux.die.net/man/3/cpu_alloc
>
> cpu_set_t *CPU_ALLOC(int num_cpus)
>
>
> so void* versus cpu_set_t*
Marco is correct. cpuset.h was your pet project a while back. Would
you like to pick it up? Maybe we should convert all the macros into
type-safe inline functions, or macros calling type-safe (inline)
functions, as on Linux as well as on BSD?
Thanks,
Corinna
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: type mismatch on cpuset.h
2023-03-06 8:55 ` Corinna Vinschen
@ 2023-03-06 9:14 ` Mark Geisert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Geisert @ 2023-03-06 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin; +Cc: Marco Atzeri
Hi Corinna, Marco,
I will look into this shortly. Sorry for the inconvenience.
..mark
On Mon, 6 Mar 2023, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Mar 6 07:57, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> building latest gdal I noticed a type mismatch, that forced me to build
>> with "-fpermissive"
>>
>> on /usr/include/sys/cpuset.h
>>
>> #define CPU_ALLOC(num) __builtin_malloc (CPU_ALLOC_SIZE(num))
>>
>>
>> but on
>> https://linux.die.net/man/3/cpu_alloc
>>
>> cpu_set_t *CPU_ALLOC(int num_cpus)
>>
>>
>> so void* versus cpu_set_t*
>
> Marco is correct. cpuset.h was your pet project a while back. Would
> you like to pick it up? Maybe we should convert all the macros into
> type-safe inline functions, or macros calling type-safe (inline)
> functions, as on Linux as well as on BSD?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Corinna
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-06 9:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-06 6:57 type mismatch on cpuset.h Marco Atzeri
2023-03-06 8:55 ` Corinna Vinschen
2023-03-06 9:14 ` Mark Geisert
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).