Re: fnmatch improvements

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>]

On Jul 28 12:56, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
> It's sometimes hard to make incremental changes to generated files of the
> GNU Build System plus Gnulib. I've therefore recreated a new tarball for you,
> at https://haible.de/bruno/gnu/testdir-fnmatch.tar.gz .
> 
> The expected result is:
>   1. cd testdir-fnmatch-posix
>      ./configure
>      grep REPLACE_FNMATCH config.status
>      (Expected: REPLACE_FNMATCH is 0)

  $ grep REPLACE_FNMATCH config.status
  S["REPLACE_FNMATCH"]="0"

>      make
>      make check
>      (Expected: No test failures)

  # TOTAL: 218
  # PASS:  178
  # SKIP:  40
  # XFAIL: 0
  # FAIL:  0
  # XPASS: 0
  # ERROR: 0

  test-fnmatch-5.sh is SKIPped because we don't support zh_CN.GB18030.

>      cd ..
>   2. cd testdir-fnmatch-gnu
>      ./configure
>      grep REPLACE_FNMATCH config.status
>      (Expected: REPLACE_FNMATCH is 1, because of FNM_EXTMATCH)

  $ grep REPLACE_FNMATCH config.status
  S["REPLACE_FNMATCH"]="1"

>      make
>      make check
>      (Expected: No test failures)

  # TOTAL: 218
  # PASS:  178
  # SKIP:  40
  # XFAIL: 0
  # FAIL:  0
  # XPASS: 0
  # ERROR: 0

  Same SKIP of test-fnmatch-5.sh.

Does that look ok?


Thanks,
Corinna