public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: SPEWS blocked me
@ 2002-11-18 23:20 Wu Yongwei
  2002-11-19 11:54 ` Scott Evans
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wu Yongwei @ 2002-11-18 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

OK, you might be right. Thanks that you at least provide a way to bypass
the foolish "anti-spam" mechanism.

The fact is that I hate the way SPEWS works. It thinks it is the crusade
and refuses to remove individual IPs. The following is what I got from
them:

--------------------
We are blocking 21vianet.com because they ignore spam complaints.
When the 21vianet spam stops, the blocks will come down. Not before.

If you have a problem, complain to 21vianet.
They are the source of your problem.

Cameron
--------------------

I don't think I can easily educate my ISP, nor can I switch my ISP
because of this. -- But I realize that I am not much better in that I
want to "cure" them instead of being "cured".... And this is going
off-topic.

I stop now.

Best regards,

Wu Yongwei

--- Original Message from Christopher Faylor ---

  > Is SPEWS necessary? I see that the whole DSL IP range of our
  > company's ISP is blocked. Terrible that each user needs to beg the
  > mercy of SPEWS or individually send request to register their e-mail
  > addresses safely to use in Cygwin.

Yeah.  It's really really terrible isn't it?  The horror of having to
take an extra five minutes to register yourself.  The mind numbing
searing pain is almost inconceivable.

  > No intention to insult. Just feel there may be alternate ways to do
  > that. Once our mail server is blocked by a open relay list, but it is
  > easier to remedy and I feel good that a security hole in our mail
  > server is eliminated.

Given that a marjority of the spam that makes it by all of the other
filters is blocked by OsiruSoft, I don't think I'm going to be
eliminating it anytime soon, especially when you can trivially bypass
the block.

cgf



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: SPEWS blocked me
  2002-11-18 23:20 SPEWS blocked me Wu Yongwei
@ 2002-11-19 11:54 ` Scott Evans
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Scott Evans @ 2002-11-19 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

Wu Yongwei <adah@netstd.com> writes:
> OK, you might be right. Thanks that you at least provide a way to bypass
> the foolish "anti-spam" mechanism.
> 
> The fact is that I hate the way SPEWS works. It thinks it is the crusade
> and refuses to remove individual IPs.

I can't stand those folks.  Their attitude sucks.

But Christopher's right, it's really no big deal to register and get
past the spam blocking for the cygwin list.



--
 scott evans :: www.antisleep.com




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: SPEWS blocked me
  2002-11-18 20:57 Wu Yongwei
@ 2002-11-18 22:05 ` Christopher Faylor
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2002-11-18 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:16:51AM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote:
>Is SPEWS necessary? I see that the whole DSL IP range of our company's 
>ISP is blocked. Terrible that each user needs to beg the mercy of SPEWS 
>or individually send request to register their e-mail addresses safely 
>to use in Cygwin.

Yeah.  It's really really terrible isn't it?  The horror of having to
take an extra five minutes to register yourself.  The mind numbing
searing pain is almost inconceivable.

>No intention to insult. Just feel there may be alternate ways to do 
>that. Once our mail server is blocked by a open relay list, but it is 
>easier to remedy and I feel good that a security hole in our mail server 
>is eliminated.

Given that a marjority of the spam that makes it by all of the other
filters is blocked by OsiruSoft, I don't think I'm going to be
eliminating it anytime soon, especially when you can trivially bypass
the block.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* SPEWS blocked me
@ 2002-11-18 20:57 Wu Yongwei
  2002-11-18 22:05 ` Christopher Faylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wu Yongwei @ 2002-11-18 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

Is SPEWS necessary? I see that the whole DSL IP range of our company's 
ISP is blocked. Terrible that each user needs to beg the mercy of SPEWS 
or individually send request to register their e-mail addresses safely 
to use in Cygwin.

No intention to insult. Just feel there may be alternate ways to do 
that. Once our mail server is blocked by a open relay list, but it is 
easier to remedy and I feel good that a security hole in our mail server 
is eliminated.

Best regards,

Wu Yongwei


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-19 19:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-18 23:20 SPEWS blocked me Wu Yongwei
2002-11-19 11:54 ` Scott Evans
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-18 20:57 Wu Yongwei
2002-11-18 22:05 ` Christopher Faylor

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).