* Package request: python-pytest-mock
@ 2022-02-16 11:16 Adam Dinwoodie
2022-02-16 11:49 ` marco atzeri
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Adam Dinwoodie @ 2022-02-16 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
As part of pulling some of the packages I maintain up to date, I've
discovered some of the test scripts now rely on the pytest-mock module.
That's not currently packaged for Cygwin; could we make it available?
I'm happy to add packaging this up to my stack of packages to maintain,
(although I'm not likely to actually get to packaging it myself for a
little while) but as most of the Python packages -- and all the
python-pytest* packages -- are currently maintained by Marco Atzeri, I
wanted to check if he'd rather add this to his list first.
Adam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: python-pytest-mock
2022-02-16 11:16 Package request: python-pytest-mock Adam Dinwoodie
@ 2022-02-16 11:49 ` marco atzeri
2022-02-16 11:55 ` Adam Dinwoodie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: marco atzeri @ 2022-02-16 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adam Dinwoodie; +Cc: The Cygwin Mailing List
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:16 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
>
> As part of pulling some of the packages I maintain up to date, I've
> discovered some of the test scripts now rely on the pytest-mock module.
> That's not currently packaged for Cygwin; could we make it available?
>
> I'm happy to add packaging this up to my stack of packages to maintain,
> (although I'm not likely to actually get to packaging it myself for a
> little while) but as most of the Python packages -- and all the
> python-pytest* packages -- are currently maintained by Marco Atzeri, I
> wanted to check if he'd rather add this to his list first.
>
> Adam
>
I will add, but I suspect it will not be very short term.
My PC is currently not 100% available :-(
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: python-pytest-mock
2022-02-16 11:49 ` marco atzeri
@ 2022-02-16 11:55 ` Adam Dinwoodie
2022-02-17 7:11 ` Marco Atzeri
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Adam Dinwoodie @ 2022-02-16 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:49:05PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:16 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> >
> > As part of pulling some of the packages I maintain up to date, I've
> > discovered some of the test scripts now rely on the pytest-mock module.
> > That's not currently packaged for Cygwin; could we make it available?
> >
> > I'm happy to add packaging this up to my stack of packages to maintain,
> > (although I'm not likely to actually get to packaging it myself for a
> > little while) but as most of the Python packages -- and all the
> > python-pytest* packages -- are currently maintained by Marco Atzeri, I
> > wanted to check if he'd rather add this to his list first.
> >
> > Adam
> >
>
> I will add, but I suspect it will not be very short term.
> My PC is currently not 100% available :-(
Oh no! If I can help get things started, I'd be very happy to :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: python-pytest-mock
2022-02-16 11:55 ` Adam Dinwoodie
@ 2022-02-17 7:11 ` Marco Atzeri
2022-02-17 10:34 ` marco atzeri
2022-02-17 13:05 ` Adam Dinwoodie
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marco Atzeri @ 2022-02-17 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
On 16.02.2022 12:55, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:49:05PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:16 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
>>>
>>> As part of pulling some of the packages I maintain up to date, I've
>>> discovered some of the test scripts now rely on the pytest-mock module.
>>> That's not currently packaged for Cygwin; could we make it available?
>>>
>>> I'm happy to add packaging this up to my stack of packages to maintain,
>>> (although I'm not likely to actually get to packaging it myself for a
>>> little while) but as most of the Python packages -- and all the
>>> python-pytest* packages -- are currently maintained by Marco Atzeri, I
>>> wanted to check if he'd rather add this to his list first.
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>
>> I will add, but I suspect it will not be very short term.
>> My PC is currently not 100% available :-(
>
> Oh no! If I can help get things started, I'd be very happy to :)
>
I succeded to sneak in the build.
version 3.7 is up for python 3.7 to 3.9
Regards
Marco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: python-pytest-mock
2022-02-17 7:11 ` Marco Atzeri
@ 2022-02-17 10:34 ` marco atzeri
2022-02-17 13:05 ` Adam Dinwoodie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: marco atzeri @ 2022-02-17 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The Cygwin Mailing List
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:11 AM Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> On 16.02.2022 12:55, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:49:05PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:16 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> >>>
> >>> As part of pulling some of the packages I maintain up to date, I've
> >>> discovered some of the test scripts now rely on the pytest-mock module.
> >>> That's not currently packaged for Cygwin; could we make it available?
> >>>
> >>> I'm happy to add packaging this up to my stack of packages to maintain,
> >>> (although I'm not likely to actually get to packaging it myself for a
> >>> little while) but as most of the Python packages -- and all the
> >>> python-pytest* packages -- are currently maintained by Marco Atzeri, I
> >>> wanted to check if he'd rather add this to his list first.
> >>>
> >>> Adam
> >>>
> >>
> >> I will add, but I suspect it will not be very short term.
> >> My PC is currently not 100% available :-(
> >
> > Oh no! If I can help get things started, I'd be very happy to :)
> >
>
> I succeded to sneak in the build.
>
> version 3.7 is up for python 3.7 to 3.9
Ops, I forgot a git push on the package list , so the upload will be
this evening
>
> Regards
> Marco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Package request: python-pytest-mock
2022-02-17 7:11 ` Marco Atzeri
2022-02-17 10:34 ` marco atzeri
@ 2022-02-17 13:05 ` Adam Dinwoodie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Adam Dinwoodie @ 2022-02-17 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:11:31AM +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 16.02.2022 12:55, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:49:05PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:16 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As part of pulling some of the packages I maintain up to date, I've
> > > > discovered some of the test scripts now rely on the pytest-mock module.
> > > > That's not currently packaged for Cygwin; could we make it available?
> > > >
> > > > I'm happy to add packaging this up to my stack of packages to maintain,
> > > > (although I'm not likely to actually get to packaging it myself for a
> > > > little while) but as most of the Python packages -- and all the
> > > > python-pytest* packages -- are currently maintained by Marco Atzeri, I
> > > > wanted to check if he'd rather add this to his list first.
> > > >
> > > > Adam
> > > >
> > >
> > > I will add, but I suspect it will not be very short term.
> > > My PC is currently not 100% available :-(
> >
> > Oh no! If I can help get things started, I'd be very happy to :)
> >
>
> I succeded to sneak in the build.
>
> version 3.7 is up for python 3.7 to 3.9
>
> Regards
> Marco
Amazing, thank you!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-17 13:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-16 11:16 Package request: python-pytest-mock Adam Dinwoodie
2022-02-16 11:49 ` marco atzeri
2022-02-16 11:55 ` Adam Dinwoodie
2022-02-17 7:11 ` Marco Atzeri
2022-02-17 10:34 ` marco atzeri
2022-02-17 13:05 ` Adam Dinwoodie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).