changed behaviour for "cygcheck -p "

changed behaviour for "cygcheck -p "

[Marco Atzeri]

It seems there is a new escape system that is fooling
the search engine

$ cygcheck -p 'bin/mutt'
Found 0 matches for binx2fmutt

same on the Web

Marco

Re: changed behaviour for "cygcheck -p "

[Brian Inglis]

On 2020-05-02 04:11, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
> It seems there is a new escape system that is fooling
> the search engine
> 
> $ cygcheck -p 'bin/mutt'
> Found 0 matches for binx2fmutt
> 
> same on the Web

e.g. Cygwin Packag Search

https://cygwin.com/packages/

enter:

"...
[ bin/cpuid.exe ] [Go]

( ) x86 (o) x86_64
..."

https://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=bin%2Fcpuid.exe&arch=x86_64

result:

"...
Cygwin Package Search

Search package contents for a grep basic regular expression pattern

[ binx2Fcpuid.exe ] [Go]

( ) x86 (o) x86_64

Search Results

 Found 0 matches for x2Fusrx2Fbinx2Fcpuid.exe
"

but tweak the browser URL directly:

https://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=bin/cpuid.exe&arch=x86_64

"...
Cygwin Package Search

Search package contents for a grep basic regular expression pattern

[ bin/cpuid.exe ] [Go]

( ) x86 (o) x86_64

Search Results

 Found 2 matches for bin/cpuid.exe

cpuid-20200211-1 - cpuid: dumps CPUID information about the CPU(s)
cpuid-20200427-1 - cpuid: dumps CPUID information about the CPU(s)
"

and curl and wget also work with the above non-urlencoded URL, so it looks like
the new server CGI borks handling urlencoded parameter values e.g. / -> %2F,
from either cygcheck -p or the web form, possibly from trying to pass thru some
urldecode filter converting %2F -> \x2F -> /, but with inadequate escaping
\\x2F, quoting '\x2F', or format (perhaps needs 0x2F?) to pass thru enough
layers to get converted, resulting in just converting "\x" to "x".

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.

Re: changed behaviour for "cygcheck -p "

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Hi -

> > It seems there is a new escape system that is fooling
> > the search engine
> > $ cygcheck -p 'bin/mutt'
> https://cygwin.com/packages/

I suspect it's not new, but yes, urlescaped %XY characters are not
correctly handled in package-grep.cgi.  Until it's fixed, you can use
dots instead of slashes, for example.

- FChE

Re: changed behaviour for "cygcheck -p "

[Marco Atzeri]

Am 02.05.2020 um 17:36 schrieb Frank Ch. Eigler via Cygwin:
> Hi -
> 
>>> It seems there is a new escape system that is fooling
>>> the search engine
>>> $ cygcheck -p 'bin/mutt'
>> https://cygwin.com/packages/
> 
> I suspect it's not new, but yes, urlescaped %XY characters are not
> correctly handled in package-grep.cgi.  Until it's fixed, you can use
> dots instead of slashes, for example.
> 
> - FChE

Hi Frank,
it was working on the old server, so it is a new issue.

Regards
Marco

Re: changed behaviour for "cygcheck -p "

[Brian Inglis]

On 2020-05-02 09:36, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>>> It seems there is a new escape system that is fooling
>>> the search engine
>>> $ cygcheck -p 'bin/mutt'
>> https://cygwin.com/packages/
> 
> I suspect it's not new, but yes, urlescaped %XY characters are not
> correctly handled in package-grep.cgi.  Until it's fixed, you can use
> dots instead of slashes, for example.

The issue is new since the new server, both cygcheck -p, and Cygwin Package
Search which it invokes at https://cygwin.com/packages/..., worked fine
previously, as the common specific search target was /usr/bin/...

Is the new RHEL/Fedora/CentOS system you are using missing url{en,de}code, or
the path to those, or something else invoked in package-grep.cgi?

Maybe update https://sourceware.org/lists.html#what-software to document recent
changes and https://sourceware.org/news.html to track issues and fixes.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.