public inbox for docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Leblanc <GLeblanc@cu-portland.edu>
To: Docbook Tools discussion list
	<docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: RE: new tools coming and a couple of renamings
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <025836EFF856D411A6660090272811E61D04EF@EMAIL> (raw)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Galassi [ mailto:rosalia@galassi.org ]
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 9:55 PM
> To: Docbook Tools discussion list
> Subject: new tools coming and a couple of renamings
> 
> Dear Docbook Tools enthusiasts,
> 
> After a long period of "no innovation", Eric Bischoff and I (Eric did
> most of the work) are about to put out an up-to-date, orthogonal and
> cleaned-up release of the docbook tools.
> 
> More details will come out soon, but meanwhile I need to poll all of
> you on one issue:
> 
> Some people have been asking us to please change the names db2html,
> db2ps, ... into docbook2html, docbook2ps, ....
> 
> I like the idea for the following reasons:
> 
> 1. The db2* names were not really thought out: they were quick handy
>    scripts at Cygnus.
> 
> 2. The letters "db" come up in "debug", "database", "docbook", and who
>    knows what else.  "db2html" is particularly dangerous.
> 
> 3. I'm not usually impressed with abbreviations.  They make things
>    hard to remember and don't save that much time.
> 
> So my proposal is to deprecate the db2* names in favor of the
> docbook2* names.  This phase-out would be extremely slow, since
> thousands of build procedures use the db2* scripts now.
> 
> Anyone wanna contribute an opinion?

I'm all for the name change, as I always think "IBM's premier database (DB2)
converted into html" rather than "DocBook converted into html".  And if
people want to keep the old names, they just edit their .profile and add
some aliases.  Later,
	Grego

             reply	other threads:[~2000-12-27  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-27  6:36 Gregory Leblanc [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-27  6:36 Mark Galassi
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Bill Brooks
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Mark Galassi
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36 ` esr
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Eric Lee Green
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Sylvan Ravinet
2000-07-21  0:08     ` Sylvan Ravinet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=025836EFF856D411A6660090272811E61D04EF@EMAIL \
    --to=gleblanc@cu-portland.edu \
    --cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).