From: Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>
To: Mark Galassi <rosalia@galassi.org>
Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Docbook in Red Hat 7.1
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 15:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010421233546.F1155@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zodaorrc.fsf@galassi.org>
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 03:41:11PM -0600, Mark Galassi wrote:
> As it turns out, Red Hat has completed what Eric and I did but never
> formally released: if they are using "jadewrapper" it means that they
> took our stuff out of CVS (and out of our interim release) and put
> that out.
Eric Bischoff had been pressing for us to use the new-trials packages,
and it became more attractive with LSB acceptance. What we have in
Red Hat Linux 7.1 is basically the new-trials packages with some
slight re-packaging and some fixes. I haven't yet sent the fixes
back, but it's on my list.
> I'll take a better look. Just a few hours ago I finally started
> preparing a new release based on all the work Eric and I did last
> summer/fall, and I think it will be good.
Cool.
> One thing you don't mention in your note is what overall wrapper they
> have.
The 'jw' script from docbook-utils-0.6.
> I'll also take a look at the index collating: I have done little with
> that, and I have not tested it either.
(Me either.)
Tim.
*/
--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE64gtBONXnILZ4yVIRAp8UAJ9uD82ydTOfkLVGOLXNAtyVf3sCUACeLM/h
xbPCMRTqR4P1dIGQUPuhlcs=
=Unca
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-21 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-21 14:35 Peter Toft
2001-04-21 14:39 ` Mark Galassi
2001-04-21 14:45 ` Peter Toft
2001-04-21 15:35 ` Tim Waugh [this message]
2001-04-21 17:48 ` Edward C. Bailey
2001-04-22 1:05 ` Peter Toft
2001-04-24 13:17 ` Edward C. Bailey
2001-04-26 10:26 ` Wookey
2001-04-26 12:00 ` Peter Toft
2001-04-27 12:01 ` Peter Toft
2001-04-30 2:22 ` Wookey
2001-04-26 11:47 ` Peter Toft
2001-04-26 11:54 ` Edward C. Bailey
2001-04-26 15:05 ` Hugo van der Kooij
2001-04-26 17:34 ` Edward C. Bailey
2001-04-29 8:15 ` Hugo van der Kooij
2001-04-26 3:04 ` Eric Bischoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010421233546.F1155@redhat.com \
--to=twaugh@redhat.com \
--cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=rosalia@galassi.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).