public inbox for docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>
To: Mark Galassi <rosalia@galassi.org>
Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Docbook in Red Hat 7.1
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 15:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010421233546.F1155@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zodaorrc.fsf@galassi.org>

On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 03:41:11PM -0600, Mark Galassi wrote:

> As it turns out, Red Hat has completed what Eric and I did but never
> formally released: if they are using "jadewrapper" it means that they
> took our stuff out of CVS (and out of our interim release) and put
> that out.

Eric Bischoff had been pressing for us to use the new-trials packages,
and it became more attractive with LSB acceptance.  What we have in
Red Hat Linux 7.1 is basically the new-trials packages with some
slight re-packaging and some fixes.  I haven't yet sent the fixes
back, but it's on my list.

> I'll take a better look.  Just a few hours ago I finally started
> preparing a new release based on all the work Eric and I did last
> summer/fall, and I think it will be good.

Cool.

> One thing you don't mention in your note is what overall wrapper they
> have.

The 'jw' script from docbook-utils-0.6.

> I'll also take a look at the index collating: I have done little with
> that, and I have not tested it either.

(Me either.)

Tim.
*/
-- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE64gtBONXnILZ4yVIRAp8UAJ9uD82ydTOfkLVGOLXNAtyVf3sCUACeLM/h
xbPCMRTqR4P1dIGQUPuhlcs=
=Unca
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-04-21 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-21 14:35 Peter Toft
2001-04-21 14:39 ` Mark Galassi
2001-04-21 14:45   ` Peter Toft
2001-04-21 15:35   ` Tim Waugh [this message]
2001-04-21 17:48     ` Edward C. Bailey
2001-04-22  1:05       ` Peter Toft
2001-04-24 13:17         ` Edward C. Bailey
2001-04-26 10:26           ` Wookey
2001-04-26 12:00             ` Peter Toft
2001-04-27 12:01             ` Peter Toft
2001-04-30  2:22               ` Wookey
2001-04-26 11:47           ` Peter Toft
2001-04-26 11:54             ` Edward C. Bailey
2001-04-26 15:05               ` Hugo van der Kooij
2001-04-26 17:34                 ` Edward C. Bailey
2001-04-29  8:15                   ` Hugo van der Kooij
2001-04-26  3:04       ` Eric Bischoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010421233546.F1155@redhat.com \
    --to=twaugh@redhat.com \
    --cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --cc=rosalia@galassi.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).