public inbox for docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Toft <pto@sslug.dk>
To: Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>
Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Red Hat 7.0 PNG problem
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011120003550.2243-101000@pto.sslug> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001111123950.D16038@redhat.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1325 bytes --]

On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Tim Waugh wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 12:35:36AM +0100, Peter Toft wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Peter Toft wrote:
> > 
> > > I wanted to try the new Red Hat 7.0 with the DocBook
> > > tools in there - it seems that the db2html stuff is
> > > working fine, but generating db2pdf jams, due to PNG
> > > images:
> 
> Could you send me (not the list) a DocBook document and db2pdf command
> line that causes this problem?

here you are

db2html bug70.sgml -> no problem
db2ps bug70.sgml -> does run - but PS file is corrupted
db2pdf bug70.sgml -> crash and burn

--------

db2pdf output;

 
LaTeX Warning: Reference `TEST-FIG' on page 4 undefined
on input line 406.
 
[4.0.46]libpng error: Application must be
recompiled; version 1.0.6 was incompatible
 
Error: pdfjadetex (file
smallfig.png): png_create_read_struct() failed   

--------

It seems that the libpng-1.0.8-1.i386.rpm from RH7.0 is
broken or at least incompatible with pdfjadetex

(Note; normally I never attach files to lists - but this 
attachment is <7kb so I hope you are not offended by it)

-- 
Peter Toft, Ph.D. [pto@sslug.dk] http://www.sslug.dk/~pto

"You don't win a battle by asking, `Will we win?' 
You win it by doing your best to win" - Richard M Stallman

LinuxKonference i København: http://LinuxForum.dk/       

[-- Attachment #2: bug70.tgz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 4544 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Peter Toft <pto@sslug.dk>
To: Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>
Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Red Hat 7.0 PNG problem
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 15:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011120003550.2243-101000@pto.sslug> (raw)
Message-ID: <20001111151800.imAfojjI654-itTACY1aZdu3-NMtEHEPsX9YY7NZiiM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001111123950.D16038@redhat.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1325 bytes --]

On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Tim Waugh wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 12:35:36AM +0100, Peter Toft wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Peter Toft wrote:
> > 
> > > I wanted to try the new Red Hat 7.0 with the DocBook
> > > tools in there - it seems that the db2html stuff is
> > > working fine, but generating db2pdf jams, due to PNG
> > > images:
> 
> Could you send me (not the list) a DocBook document and db2pdf command
> line that causes this problem?

here you are

db2html bug70.sgml -> no problem
db2ps bug70.sgml -> does run - but PS file is corrupted
db2pdf bug70.sgml -> crash and burn

--------

db2pdf output;

 
LaTeX Warning: Reference `TEST-FIG' on page 4 undefined
on input line 406.
 
[4.0.46]libpng error: Application must be
recompiled; version 1.0.6 was incompatible
 
Error: pdfjadetex (file
smallfig.png): png_create_read_struct() failed   

--------

It seems that the libpng-1.0.8-1.i386.rpm from RH7.0 is
broken or at least incompatible with pdfjadetex

(Note; normally I never attach files to lists - but this 
attachment is <7kb so I hope you are not offended by it)

-- 
Peter Toft, Ph.D. [pto@sslug.dk] http://www.sslug.dk/~pto

"You don't win a battle by asking, `Will we win?' 
You win it by doing your best to win" - Richard M Stallman

LinuxKonference i København: http://LinuxForum.dk/       

[-- Attachment #2: bug70.tgz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 4544 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-12-27  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-27  6:36 .pdf generation error using the "newer" tools Bill Brooks
2000-10-10 21:52 ` Bill Brooks
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-10-11  4:53   ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Bill Brooks
2000-10-11 15:28     ` Bill Brooks
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Eric Bischoff
2000-10-12  4:54       ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Red Hat 7.0 PNG problem Peter Toft
2000-10-11 12:24     ` Peter Toft
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Peter Toft
2000-11-10 15:36       ` Peter Toft
2000-12-27  6:36       ` Tim Waugh
2000-11-11  4:39         ` Tim Waugh
2000-12-27  6:36         ` Peter Toft [this message]
2000-11-11 15:18           ` Peter Toft
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Tim Waugh
2000-11-13  2:11             ` Tim Waugh
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Peter Toft
2000-11-13 10:48               ` Peter Toft
2000-12-27  6:36               ` Tim Waugh
2000-11-13 13:21                 ` Tim Waugh
2000-12-27  6:36                 ` Peter Toft
2000-11-13 13:53                   ` Peter Toft

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0011120003550.2243-101000@pto.sslug \
    --to=pto@sslug.dk \
    --cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=twaugh@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).