public inbox for ecos-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug 1000693] New: flash.c assertion failure
@ 2009-02-22 19:42 bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-03 13:16 ` [Bug 1000693] " bugzilla-daemon
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-02-22 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-bugs
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000693
Summary: flash.c assertion failure
Product: eCos
Version: 3.0beta1
Platform: linux (Linux synthetic target)
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Flash driver
AssignedTo: gary@mlbassoc.com
ReportedBy: andrew.lunn@ascom.ch
QAContact: ecos-bugs@ecos.sourceware.org
Class: ---
synth target, template all.
/home/lunn/eCos/work/install/tests/devs/flash/synthv2/current/tests/flash3
ASSERT FAIL: <1>flash.c[228]cyg_flash_init() incorrect number of flash devices
ASSERT FAIL: <1>flash.c [ 228] cyg_flash_init()
incorrect
number of flash devices
Some of the other flash test cases are also failing....
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug 1000693] flash.c assertion failure
2009-02-22 19:42 [Bug 1000693] New: flash.c assertion failure bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-03-03 13:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-03 14:59 ` [Issue " bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-03-03 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-bugs
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000693
John Dallaway <john@dallaway.org.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bartv@ecoscentric.com
--- Comment #2 from John Dallaway <john@dallaway.org.uk> 2009-03-03 13:16:09 ---
Adding Bart Veer to the CC list for comment.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Issue 1000693] flash.c assertion failure
2009-02-22 19:42 [Bug 1000693] New: flash.c assertion failure bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-03 13:16 ` [Bug 1000693] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-03-03 14:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-19 11:20 ` [Bug " bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-20 20:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-03-03 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-bugs
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000693
--- Comment #3 from Bart Veer <bartv@ecoscentric.com> 2009-03-03 14:59:42 ---
Adding a flash driver in user space is not a common requirement, but
the synthetic target can be rather more dynamic than a physical board.
I can think of other scenarios where it might be desirable, for
example a board with the SPI signals on an expansion connector and
hooked up to an external dataflash. Some people may prefer to instantiate
the dataflash device in application space rather than update the platform
HAL and the target definition.
So, adding CYGHWR_IO_FLASH_DEVICE_USERSPACE is probably the sensible
way to go. The flash3.c test would then need a #ifdef on that option.
Unfortunately that means the test won't actually be run very often -
only when the application developer has explicitly enabled that
option.
I am not sure why you think _USERSPACE should implement
CYGHWR_IO_FLASH_DEVICE twice? Are you worried about the case where
there are zero flash devices in the target definition and >=2 flash
devices in user space? If so, having two implements properties would
indeed be the safe solution.
Bart
--
Configure issuemail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the issue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug 1000693] flash.c assertion failure
2009-02-22 19:42 [Bug 1000693] New: flash.c assertion failure bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-03 13:16 ` [Bug 1000693] " bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-03 14:59 ` [Issue " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-03-19 11:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-20 20:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-03-19 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-bugs
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000693
--- Comment #4 from John Dallaway <john@dallaway.org.uk> 2009-03-19 11:20:30 ---
Andrew, are you able to sort this out for eCos 3.0 or should we push it out to
be fixed at some later time?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug 1000693] flash.c assertion failure
2009-02-22 19:42 [Bug 1000693] New: flash.c assertion failure bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-19 11:20 ` [Bug " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-03-20 20:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-03-20 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-bugs
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000693
Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |Blocking_3.0-
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch> 2009-03-20 20:27:53 ---
It is a corner case which will not affect many users, only those with pluggable
flash devices, eg DataFlash. So i suggest we don't have this as a blocker for
3.0.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-20 20:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-22 19:42 [Bug 1000693] New: flash.c assertion failure bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-03 13:16 ` [Bug 1000693] " bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-03 14:59 ` [Issue " bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-19 11:20 ` [Bug " bugzilla-daemon
2009-03-20 20:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).