* [ECOS] Re: Linux or ecos?
@ 2001-11-07 11:23 Phil Dempster
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Phil Dempster @ 2001-11-07 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-discuss
> The application itself is very simple and only needs access to serial
> devices and to ethernet (with TCP/IP)...
> ...but it should be used as minimum RAM and FLASH as possible.
If you are concerned more about code size than having a full featured TCP/IP
implementation, you might want to look at lwIP
(http://www.sics.se/~adam/lwip/). I have had a quick look at porting this
to eCos (to the stage of getting it to compile) and it seems relatively
straightforward. It is a lot leaner both in terms of footprint and RAM
usage than the eCos net package.
> There is another idea I think of, I want to write source of my
> application POSIX compatible because in future the application will be
> more complex
You need to use the EL/IX eCos template to get the POSIX compatibility
layer. The EL/IX specification can be found at
http://sources.redhat.com/elix/.
Cheers,
Phil.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-11-15 10:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-11-07 11:23 [ECOS] Re: Linux or ecos? Phil Dempster
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).