* AW: [ECOS] Re: C++ Support
@ 2005-05-20 13:36 Neundorf, Alexander
2005-05-20 15:04 ` Øyvind Harboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Neundorf, Alexander @ 2005-05-20 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Øyvind Harboe; +Cc: ecos-discuss
Hi,
> Von: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
...
> I'm using both STLport and libstdc++ w/eCos.
>
> It isn't supported out of the box, but it isn't too hard to get it
> working and I haven't seen any problems once up and running.
>
> The instructions are a bit crude and there are some somewhat
> questionable steps due to newlib/eCos issues, but you can
> always buy the
> eCosPro kit if you want something that is fully tested and
> works out of
> the box :-)
>
> http://www.zylin.com/libstdc++.html
> http://www.zylin.com/stlport.html
Can you compare both ? Code size, execution speed, memory consumption, general impression, problems, etc. ?
> For the libstdc++ stuff I submitted a patch to eCos w.r.t. some issues
> with using C++ early in eCos startup, but it didn't receive
> any comments
> so far:
>
> http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-patches/2005-04/msg00007.html
I guess you should post again :-)
Bye
Alex
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: AW: [ECOS] Re: C++ Support
2005-05-20 13:36 AW: [ECOS] Re: C++ Support Neundorf, Alexander
@ 2005-05-20 15:04 ` Øyvind Harboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Øyvind Harboe @ 2005-05-20 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neundorf, Alexander; +Cc: ecos-discuss
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 11:11 +0200, Neundorf, Alexander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Von: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
> ...
> > I'm using both STLport and libstdc++ w/eCos.
> >
> > It isn't supported out of the box, but it isn't too hard to get it
> > working and I haven't seen any problems once up and running.
> >
> > The instructions are a bit crude and there are some somewhat
> > questionable steps due to newlib/eCos issues, but you can
> > always buy the
> > eCosPro kit if you want something that is fully tested and
> > works out of
> > the box :-)
> >
> > http://www.zylin.com/libstdc++.html
> > http://www.zylin.com/stlport.html
>
> Can you compare both ? Code size, execution speed, memory consumption, general impression, problems, etc. ?
No appreciable difference in code size and I haven't tested performance.
The main reason I wanted to get libstdc++ working was that at some point
I want to switch to GCC 3.4.2 for new projects and the STLport guys
haven't taken an interest in eCos support AFAICT. Presumably libstdc++
support would work for future GCC versions without much effort as
compared to STLport.
My impression is that libstc++ is more heavily tested(ref. libstdc++ GCC
testsuite on a raft of platforms) and there is a consensus(pthreads) on
how to support multithreaded exceptions.
> > For the libstdc++ stuff I submitted a patch to eCos w.r.t. some issues
> > with using C++ early in eCos startup, but it didn't receive
> > any comments
> > so far:
> >
> > http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-patches/2005-04/msg00007.html
>
> I guess you should post again :-)
Well.... I wonder. eCosPro contains libstdc++ support. So... ?
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-20 10:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-20 13:36 AW: [ECOS] Re: C++ Support Neundorf, Alexander
2005-05-20 15:04 ` Øyvind Harboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).