* [ECOS] Maximum size of Ping?
@ 2000-12-07 17:36 Brian.Danilko
2000-12-07 17:52 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian.Danilko @ 2000-12-07 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-discuss
Hello,
Using the ecos tcp/ip stack I have noticed that it will only reply to
pings of less then or equal to 3700 bytes (ie. ping -s 3042
ecos_ip). Anything over this number gets dropped silently. Is this by
design?
Thanks,
Brian
--
Brian Danilko - Software Design and Implementation
@ Inspiration Technology P/L (Brian.Danilko@instech.com.au)
Signal Processing Research & Design
@ Formal Solutions (bdanilko@formalsolutions.com.au)
Software Development, Technical Writing & Training
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] Maximum size of Ping?
2000-12-07 17:36 [ECOS] Maximum size of Ping? Brian.Danilko
@ 2000-12-07 17:52 ` Jonathan Larmour
2000-12-07 21:01 ` Brian.Danilko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2000-12-07 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian.Danilko; +Cc: ecos-discuss
Brian.Danilko@instech.com.au wrote:
>
> Using the ecos tcp/ip stack I have noticed that it will only reply to
> pings of less then or equal to 3700 bytes (ie. ping -s 3042
> ecos_ip). Anything over this number gets dropped silently. Is this by
> design?
No. You need to update your TCP/IP stack to one from after the end of June.
Get it from anoncvs: http://sources.redhat.com/anoncvs.html although you'll
have to use anoncvs for everything then.
Jifl
--
Red Hat, 35 Cambridge Place, Cambridge, UK. CB2 1NS Tel: +44 (1223) 728762
"Plan to be spontaneous tomorrow." || These opinions are all my own fault
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] Maximum size of Ping?
2000-12-07 17:52 ` Jonathan Larmour
@ 2000-12-07 21:01 ` Brian.Danilko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian.Danilko @ 2000-12-07 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: Brian.Danilko, ecos-discuss
Jonathan Larmour writes:
> Brian.Danilko@instech.com.au wrote:
> >
> > Using the ecos tcp/ip stack I have noticed that it will only reply to
> > pings of less then or equal to 3700 bytes (ie. ping -s 3042
> > ecos_ip). Anything over this number gets dropped silently. Is this by
> > design?
>
> No. You need to update your TCP/IP stack to one from after the end of June.
> Get it from anoncvs: http://sources.redhat.com/anoncvs.html although you'll
> have to use anoncvs for everything then.
>
Thanks for your swift reply. I have been using anoncvs and did my last
checkout in November. I just checked to make sure that my networking
code was up to date and it is.
Are there any settings that could be constraining the ICMP packet
size? Are the regression tests testing large ping packets?
Thanks,
Brian
--
Brian Danilko - Software Design and Implementation
@ Inspiration Technology P/L (Brian.Danilko@instech.com.au)
Signal Processing Research & Design
@ Formal Solutions (bdanilko@formalsolutions.com.au)
Software Development, Technical Writing & Training
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-07 21:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-07 17:36 [ECOS] Maximum size of Ping? Brian.Danilko
2000-12-07 17:52 ` Jonathan Larmour
2000-12-07 21:01 ` Brian.Danilko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).