* [ECOS] flash driver interface questions
@ 2002-07-11 6:58 Jani Monoses
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jani Monoses @ 2002-07-11 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-discuss
I see that in low level flash drivers flash_erase_block has one parameter.
Exceptions are the Intel StrataFlash and the synth target flash which have 2 parameters.
The upper layer io/flash/../flash.c calls this with 2 arguments.
The same is true for flash_program_buf: strata and synth have 5 arguments while the rest
of the drivers have 3.The upper layer calls this low level fn with 5 arguments.
Is one interface preferable over the other?Which is newest?
Thanks
Jani
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-07-11 13:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-11 6:58 [ECOS] flash driver interface questions Jani Monoses
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).