* [ECOS] more scheduling priorities
@ 2005-07-10 22:03 Will Lentz
2005-07-11 7:15 ` Andrew Lunn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Will Lentz @ 2005-07-10 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos
Hi,
Is it possible to get Nick's patch adding more scheduling priorities
applied to CVS? or maybe just put a link to this patch somewhere?
http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2003-03/msg00362.html
It works well for me, and others may be interested. I didn't see any
obvious place to find this patch - I'm just lucky enough to have
stumbled across it. Let me know if I can help in any way.
Thanks,
Will
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] more scheduling priorities
2005-07-10 22:03 [ECOS] more scheduling priorities Will Lentz
@ 2005-07-11 7:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2005-07-11 8:33 ` Nick Garnett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2005-07-11 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Will Lentz; +Cc: ecos
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 03:03:44PM -0700, Will Lentz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to get Nick's patch adding more scheduling priorities
> applied to CVS? or maybe just put a link to this patch somewhere?
> http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2003-03/msg00362.html
That would be for Nick to decide.
Andrew
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [ECOS] more scheduling priorities
2005-07-11 7:15 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2005-07-11 8:33 ` Nick Garnett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nick Garnett @ 2005-07-11 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn; +Cc: Will Lentz, ecos
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 03:03:44PM -0700, Will Lentz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it possible to get Nick's patch adding more scheduling priorities
> > applied to CVS? or maybe just put a link to this patch somewhere?
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2003-03/msg00362.html
You could try applying that patch and see what happens. It may need a
little editing to get it to apply cleanly, but not much has happened
in that code for some time, so it should be too difficult.
>
> That would be for Nick to decide.
As the message says, this is potentially a destabilizing change to the
scheduler. It really needs some intensive testing, and maybe even some
specific test programs written to exercise it. I'm also not very happy
with the choice of names used here, and the fact that several
assertion tests become impossible, and would like to rewrite it a
little before committing it.
--
Nick Garnett eCos Kernel Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com The eCos and RedBoot experts
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-11 8:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-10 22:03 [ECOS] more scheduling priorities Will Lentz
2005-07-11 7:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2005-07-11 8:33 ` Nick Garnett
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).