public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Veer <bartv@ecoscentric.com>
To: nickg@ecoscentric.com
Cc: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Mutex & Asserts during initialisation
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050711104740.04D4B65C07D@smtp.ecoscentric.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3r7e5hi5m.fsf@xl5.calivar.com> (message from Nick Garnett on 11 Jul 2005 09:16:21 +0100)

>>>>> "Nick" == Nick Garnett <nickg@ecoscentric.com> writes:

    <snip>

    >> I can see the other side of this. You want to write a driver
    >> that can work in a multi-threaded environment, so you include a
    >> mutex in it. But then you want to call it from startup code.
    >> Rather than write a second specialized non-multi-threaded
    >> driver, or include some sort of flag that tells it to skip the
    >> locking and unlocking, it's much cleaner to simply consider the
    >> attempt to lock a mutex before the threading system has been
    >> initialized a harmless null operation.

    Nick> And this is exactly what happens. The kernel installs the
    Nick> idle thread as the current thread as soon as it is
    Nick> initialized so that mutexes and semaphores will operate
    Nick> correctly before the scheduler starts.

    Nick> However, device drivers are usually initialized before this
    Nick> point, on the assumption that the hardware should be
    Nick> initialized as early as possible. Wallclock devices are
    Nick> initialized a little later, but still before the idle
    Nick> thread.

    Nick> The driver initialization priority was set long before these
    Nick> layered I2C and SPI drivers were introduced. These are a
    Nick> fairly new feature, and there are clearly a few teething
    Nick> troubles.

    Nick> I suspect that the correct fix for this problem is to move
    Nick> the initialization of the DS1307 to after the idle thread in
    Nick> initialized. The simplest way of doing this is to make all
    Nick> wallclock devices use CYG_INIT_IO priority.

I agree this is the right short-term solution.

In the medium or long term we may want to rethink the predefined
constructor priorities. The current order is not necessarily optimal,
and I would like to see a few more categories. It is a hard problem
with lots of potential for circular dependencies and destabilizing
existing systems, so I need to think about it for a while before
coming up with a proposal.

Bart

-- 
Bart Veer                       eCos Configuration Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com/     The eCos and RedBoot experts


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-11 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-08 12:15 Will Wagner
2005-07-08 14:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2005-07-08 14:18   ` Will Wagner
2005-07-09 14:30   ` Paul D. DeRocco
2005-07-11  7:52     ` Fabian Scheler
2005-07-11  9:36     ` Nick Garnett
2005-07-11 10:30       ` [ECOS] issues: memcpy in flash_config_insert_value & exec -r Michael Anburaj
2005-07-12  1:22         ` [ECOS] SOS: " Michael Anburaj
2005-07-12  1:30           ` Gary Thomas
2005-07-11 10:47       ` Bart Veer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050711104740.04D4B65C07D@smtp.ecoscentric.com \
    --to=bartv@ecoscentric.com \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org \
    --cc=nickg@ecoscentric.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).