[ECOS] Ecosconfig and configtool

[ECOS] Ecosconfig and configtool

[Emmanuel Viollet]

Hi.

Under Windows, which tool am I supposed to use? ecosconfig or configtool?
I see that the two tools do not produce the same results (different 
directory structures for instance).
Is this normal?

In advance, thanks.

-- 
Emmanuel Viollet
Software engineer
Webdyn
e-mail : Emmanuel.Viollet@webdyn.com
Tel    : +33 (0)1 39 04 29 55


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

Re: [ECOS] Ecosconfig and configtool

[Andrew Lunn]

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:25:26AM +0200, Emmanuel Viollet wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Under Windows, which tool am I supposed to use? ecosconfig or configtool?

Free choice. You can use either. You should also be able to use both
on the same tree.

   Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

AW: [ECOS] Ecosconfig and configtool

[Ram Sudhir Tadavarthi]

Hi,

Configtool is Graphical tool and ecosconfig is command line tool. You can
use either as per your convenience. I prefer to use configtool. IMHO both
should provide same results though I never tried to use ecosconfig tool
much.

Warm regards,
ram

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
[mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org] Im Auftrag von Emmanuel
Viollet
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 10:25
An: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
Betreff: [ECOS] Ecosconfig and configtool

Hi.

Under Windows, which tool am I supposed to use? ecosconfig or configtool?
I see that the two tools do not produce the same results (different 
directory structures for instance).
Is this normal?

In advance, thanks.

-- 
Emmanuel Viollet
Software engineer
Webdyn
e-mail : Emmanuel.Viollet@webdyn.com
Tel    : +33 (0)1 39 04 29 55


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss


--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

Re: AW: [ECOS] Ecosconfig and configtool

[Emmanuel Viollet]

Hi.

Thanks.
Actually  my current problem is that if I use configtool, I get the 
following error upon compilation :
arm-elf-gcc -finline-limit=7000 -mcpu=arm7tdmi -mno-short-load-words 
-Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Winline -Wundef 
-Woverloaded-virtual -g -O2 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections 
-fno-rtti -fno-exceptions    
-I/ecos-e/Projets/eCOS/Tests/OlimexLPC2106PPP/ecos_install/include 
-I/opt/ecos/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/current 
-I/opt/ecos/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/current/src 
-I/opt/ecos/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/current/tests -I. -Wp,-MD,arm.tmp 
-o hal_mk_defs.tmp -S 
/opt/ecos/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/current/src/hal_mk_defs.c
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/ecos-e/Projets/eCOS/Tests/OlimexLPC2106PPP/ecos_build/hal/arm/arch/current'
cc1: error: invalid option `no-short-load-words'
make: Leaving directory 
`/ecos-e/Projets/eCOS/Tests/OlimexLPC2106PPP/ecos_build'
cc1: warning: command line option "-Woverloaded-virtual" is valid for 
C++/ObjC++ but not for C
cc1: warning: command line option "-fno-rtti" is valid for C++/ObjC++ 
but not for C
make[1]: *** [arm.inc] Error 1
make: *** [build] Error 2

whereas if I compile using make in the cygwin shell, it works.
Apparently configtool isn't using the correct cc1 compiler. Where can I 
configure this?

In advance, thanks.


Ram Sudhir Tadavarthi a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Configtool is Graphical tool and ecosconfig is command line tool. You can
> use either as per your convenience. I prefer to use configtool. IMHO both
> should provide same results though I never tried to use ecosconfig tool
> much.
>
> Warm regards,
> ram
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
> [mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org] Im Auftrag von Emmanuel
> Viollet
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 10:25
> An: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
> Betreff: [ECOS] Ecosconfig and configtool
>
> Hi.
>
> Under Windows, which tool am I supposed to use? ecosconfig or configtool?
> I see that the two tools do not produce the same results (different 
> directory structures for instance).
> Is this normal?
>
> In advance, thanks.
>
>   


-- 
Emmanuel Viollet
Software engineer
Webdyn
e-mail : Emmanuel.Viollet@webdyn.com
Tel    : +33 (0)1 39 04 29 55


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

Re: AW: [ECOS] Ecosconfig and configtool

[Andy Jackson]

Try just removing '-mno-short-load-words' from the entry for 'Global 
compiler flags' in the 'Global build options' folder.

I think more recent versions of GCC refuse to accept this option any more.

    Andy..

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Emmanuel Viollet" <Emmanuel.Viollet@webdyn.com>
To: "Ram Sudhir Tadavarthi" <ram.tadavarthi@netco.de>
Cc: <ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [ECOS] Ecosconfig and configtool


> Hi.
>
> Thanks.
> Actually  my current problem is that if I use configtool, I get the 
> following error upon compilation :
> arm-elf-gcc -finline-limit=7000 -mcpu=arm7tdmi -mno-short-load-words -Wall 
>  -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Winline -Wundef -Woverloaded-virtual 
>  -g -O2 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions    -I/ecos-e/Projets/eCOS/Tests/OlimexLPC2106PPP/ecos_install/include 
>  -I/opt/ecos/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/current -I/opt/ecos/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/current/src 
>  -I/opt/ecos/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/current/tests -I. -Wp,-MD,arm.tmp  
> -o hal_mk_defs.tmp -S 
> /opt/ecos/ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/current/src/hal_mk_defs.c
> make[1]: Leaving directory 
> `/ecos-e/Projets/eCOS/Tests/OlimexLPC2106PPP/ecos_build/hal/arm/arch/current'
> cc1: error: invalid option `no-short-load-words'
> make: Leaving directory 
> `/ecos-e/Projets/eCOS/Tests/OlimexLPC2106PPP/ecos_build'
> cc1: warning: command line option "-Woverloaded-virtual" is valid for 
> C++/ObjC++ but not for C
> cc1: warning: command line option "-fno-rtti" is valid for C++/ObjC++ but 
> not for C
> make[1]: *** [arm.inc] Error 1
> make: *** [build] Error 2
>
> whereas if I compile using make in the cygwin shell, it works.
> Apparently configtool isn't using the correct cc1 compiler. Where can I 
> configure this?
>
> In advance, thanks.
>
>
> Ram Sudhir Tadavarthi a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Configtool is Graphical tool and ecosconfig is command line tool. You can
>> use either as per your convenience. I prefer to use configtool. IMHO both
>> should provide same results though I never tried to use ecosconfig tool
>> much.
>>
>> Warm regards,
>> ram
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
>> [mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org] Im Auftrag von Emmanuel
>> Viollet
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 10:25
>> An: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
>> Betreff: [ECOS] Ecosconfig and configtool
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Under Windows, which tool am I supposed to use? ecosconfig or configtool?
>> I see that the two tools do not produce the same results (different 
>> directory structures for instance).
>> Is this normal?
>>
>> In advance, thanks.
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Emmanuel Viollet
> Software engineer
> Webdyn
> e-mail : Emmanuel.Viollet@webdyn.com
> Tel    : +33 (0)1 39 04 29 55
>
>
> -- 
> Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
> and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
> 


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

Re: AW: [ECOS] Ecosconfig and configtool

[Emmanuel Viollet]

Andy Jackson a écrit :
> Try just removing '-mno-short-load-words' from the entry for 'Global 
> compiler flags' in the 'Global build options' folder.
>
> I think more recent versions of GCC refuse to accept this option any 
> more.
>
>    Andy..
>
Thanks for the information.
I discovered I had a more recent version of GCC installed. When 
compiling using the graphical tool it was using the newest GCC. On the 
other hand, when compiling in a cygwin shell, it was using the old gcc 
version I downloaded with eCOS.
So I am now using the new GCC version, and, apparently it has reduced 
the code footprint.

-- 
Emmanuel Viollet
Software engineer
Webdyn
e-mail : Emmanuel.Viollet@webdyn.com
Tel    : +33 (0)1 39 04 29 55


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss