[ECOS] snapshots

[ECOS] snapshots

[Motoya Kurotsu]

Hi, all:

Is the snapshots site (http://www.ecoscentric.com/snapshots) alive?
I failed to access there yesterday and today.
Have anyone succeeded?

Apr/09/03
Motoya Kurotsu
Allied Telesis K.K.


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

Re: [ECOS] snapshots

[Gary Thomas]

On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 19:30, Motoya Kurotsu wrote:
> Hi, all:
> 
> Is the snapshots site (http://www.ecoscentric.com/snapshots) alive?
> I failed to access there yesterday and today.
> Have anyone succeeded?

What sort of problems are you having?

This machine & link are definitely up.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |
MLB Associates              |  Consulting for the
+1 (970) 229-1963           |    Embedded world
http://www.mlbassoc.com/    |
email: <gary@mlbassoc.com>  |
gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc
------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

Re: [ECOS] snapshots

[Jonathan Larmour]

Gary Thomas wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 19:30, Motoya Kurotsu wrote:
> 
>>Hi, all:
>>
>>Is the snapshots site (http://www.ecoscentric.com/snapshots) alive?
>>I failed to access there yesterday and today.
>>Have anyone succeeded?
> 
> 
> What sort of problems are you having?
> 
> This machine & link are definitely up.

Yep... the site moved to a new machine just a couple of days ago, although 
we missed a few things (including http://www.ecoscentric.com/snapshots not 
working, although http://www.ecoscentric.com/snapshots/ was!).

It should be there now.

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

Re: [ECOS] snapshots

[Iztok Zupet]

On Wednesday 09 April 2003 19:08, Jonathan Larmour wrote:

> Yep... the site moved to a new machine just a couple of days ago, although
> we missed a few things (including http://www.ecoscentric.com/snapshots not
> working, although http://www.ecoscentric.com/snapshots/ was!).

Had the same problems with links on www.ecos2.vsr.si. Plus misterious broken 
pipe errors with Apache. Installing a bit newer version of Apache fixes all.

Iztok

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

[ECOS] RedBoot_INIT_TAB initialization ?

[Rupesh S]

Hi

In the eCos Sorce directory, specifically in the Redboot sources, there is a
structure member named __RedBoot_INIT_TAB__ of  struct "init_tab_entry."
The above structure seems to have a member , "fun". (function pointer).
Can any body tell me where are these structures initialized, and what are
they initialized to..?
I presume, these should be initialized to the cpu/board specific
initialization functions.

Expecting help

Rupesh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Iztok Zupet" <iz@vsr.si>
To: "Jonathan Larmour" <jifl@eCosCentric.com>; "Motoya Kurotsu"
<kurotsu@allied-telesis.co.jp>
Cc: "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com>; "eCos Discussion"
<ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: [ECOS] snapshots


> On Wednesday 09 April 2003 19:08, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>
> > Yep... the site moved to a new machine just a couple of days ago,
although
> > we missed a few things (including http://www.ecoscentric.com/snapshots
not
> > working, although http://www.ecoscentric.com/snapshots/ was!).
>
> Had the same problems with links on www.ecos2.vsr.si. Plus misterious
broken
> pipe errors with Apache. Installing a bit newer version of Apache fixes
all.
>
> Iztok
>
> --
> Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
> and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
>


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

Re: [ECOS] RedBoot_INIT_TAB initialization ?

[Andrew Lunn]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:38:43PM -0700, Rupesh S wrote:
> Hi
> 
> In the eCos Sorce directory, specifically in the Redboot sources, there is a
> structure member named __RedBoot_INIT_TAB__ of  struct "init_tab_entry."
> The above structure seems to have a member , "fun". (function pointer).
> Can any body tell me where are these structures initialized, and what are
> they initialized to..?

Look for code like:

RedBoot_init(net_init, RedBoot_INIT_LAST);

    Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

[ECOS] Re: RedBoot_INIT_TAB initialization ?

[Jonathan Larmour]

[ Why did you reply to a completely unrelated message, preserving the 
individual CCs? ]

Rupesh S wrote:
> Hi
> 
> In the eCos Sorce directory, specifically in the Redboot sources, there is a
> structure member named __RedBoot_INIT_TAB__ of  struct "init_tab_entry."
> The above structure seems to have a member , "fun". (function pointer).
> Can any body tell me where are these structures initialized, and what are
> they initialized to..?
> I presume, these should be initialized to the cpu/board specific
> initialization functions.

No. It's for general initialization required by things in RedBoot. Search 
the tree for uses of the RedBoot_init macro.

> Expecting help

No one can *expect* help on ecos-discuss. That's why there are companies 
here that sell support.

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

Re: [ECOS] Re: RedBoot_INIT_TAB initialization ?

[Rupesh S]

Hi,
I'm facing a problem with Redboot on target board se77x9.
The redboot image when , deployed on to the board and run, it hangs in the
following place

Function : cyg_start()  in file packagesredboot/v2_0b1/src/main.c

    for (init_entry = __RedBoot_INIT_TAB__; init_entry !=
&__RedBoot_INIT_TAB_END__;  init_entry++) {
        (*init_entry->fun)();
    }

If I comment the above pice of code, I get the Redboot banner. But the
network related functionalities does not work.

For building the Redboot image I did the following,
Selected target as se77x9 (redboot).
Imported Redboot_7729_ROM.ecm.
make library.

This gave me redboot.eeprom.drec, which is the image I talked about in the
beginning.

Rupesh

> Rupesh S wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > In the eCos Sorce directory, specifically in the Redboot sources, there
is a
> > structure member named __RedBoot_INIT_TAB__ of  struct "init_tab_entry."
> > The above structure seems to have a member , "fun". (function pointer).
> > Can any body tell me where are these structures initialized, and what
are
> > they initialized to..?
> > I presume, these should be initialized to the cpu/board specific
> > initialization functions.
>
> No. It's for general initialization required by things in RedBoot. Search
> the tree for uses of the RedBoot_init macro.
>
> > Expecting help
>



-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

Re: [ECOS] Re: RedBoot_INIT_TAB initialization ?

[Jonathan Larmour]

Rupesh S wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm facing a problem with Redboot on target board se77x9.
> The redboot image when , deployed on to the board and run, it hangs in the
> following place
> 
> Function : cyg_start()  in file packagesredboot/v2_0b1/src/main.c
> 
>     for (init_entry = __RedBoot_INIT_TAB__; init_entry !=
> &__RedBoot_INIT_TAB_END__;  init_entry++) {
>         (*init_entry->fun)();
>     }
> 
> If I comment the above pice of code, I get the Redboot banner. But the
> network related functionalities does not work.

That's not surprising since it then doesn't get initialised!

Single step it.

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

[ECOS] Fujitsu FLASH driver Support on SH3 77x9 board

[Rupesh S]

Hi

In the redboot packages for target board, se77x9, the Flash device supports
avalable are that of AMD Flashes.
But on the MS7729SE01 board,(which is listed in se77x9 docs), the Flash is
FUJITSU 29LV160T.
By default, the Flash device getting enabled in the Redboot packages for the
above board is AMD AM29LV160.

I suspect the code getting hanged at the point where the Flash
initialization is done,

Any one has any suggestions ?

Rupesh


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

[ECOS] Re: Fujitsu FLASH driver Support on SH3 77x9 board

[Jonathan Larmour]

Rupesh S wrote:
> Hi
> 
> In the redboot packages for target board, se77x9, the Flash device supports
> avalable are that of AMD Flashes.
> But on the MS7729SE01 board,(which is listed in se77x9 docs), the Flash is
> FUJITSU 29LV160T.
> By default, the Flash device getting enabled in the Redboot packages for the
> above board is AMD AM29LV160.
> 
> I suspect the code getting hanged at the point where the Flash
> initialization is done,

I haven't looked at the Fujitsu docs, but I would strongly expect it's 
meant to be compatible. I suggest you find the docs to find out.

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss