* [ECOS] Maximum number of TCP connections
@ 2002-10-24 2:58 llandre
2002-10-24 3:08 ` Andrew Lunn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: llandre @ 2002-10-24 2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-discuss
I did not understand if it is possibile and how to set the maximum number
of TCP connections acceptable by the stack.
From this point of view, are there differences between the two stacks
(OpenBSD and FreeBSD)?
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] Maximum number of TCP connections
2002-10-24 2:58 [ECOS] Maximum number of TCP connections llandre
@ 2002-10-24 3:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-10-24 3:32 ` llandre
2002-11-23 6:00 ` [ECOS] RTP for ecos A.K.V.SAI JAYRAM
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2002-10-24 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: llandre; +Cc: ecos-discuss
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:01:10PM +0200, llandre wrote:
> I did not understand if it is possibile and how to set the maximum number
> of TCP connections acceptable by the stack.
> From this point of view, are there differences between the two stacks
> (OpenBSD and FreeBSD)?
Each socket needs a file descriptor. There are two things you need to
configure:
CYGPKG_IO_NFILE
CYGNUM_FILEIO_NFD
By default these are 16, so you have a maximum of 16 open sockets and
files.
Both stacks come from the Unix world, so the stacks themselves should
have no practical limit. Memory is probably you limitation.
Andrew
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] Maximum number of TCP connections
2002-10-24 3:08 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2002-10-24 3:32 ` llandre
2002-10-24 3:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-11-23 6:00 ` [ECOS] RTP for ecos A.K.V.SAI JAYRAM
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: llandre @ 2002-10-24 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn; +Cc: ecos-discuss, matto
>On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:01:10PM +0200, llandre wrote:
> > I did not understand if it is possibile and how to set the maximum number
> > of TCP connections acceptable by the stack.
> > From this point of view, are there differences between the two stacks
> > (OpenBSD and FreeBSD)?
>
>Each socket needs a file descriptor. There are two things you need to
>configure:
>
>CYGPKG_IO_NFILE
>CYGNUM_FILEIO_NFD
>
>By default these are 16, so you have a maximum of 16 open sockets and
>files.
>
>Both stacks come from the Unix world, so the stacks themselves should
>have no practical limit. Memory is probably you limitation.
>
> Andrew
Can you estimate the memory footprint required by each open socket/file?
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] Maximum number of TCP connections
2002-10-24 3:32 ` llandre
@ 2002-10-24 3:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-10-24 5:36 ` llandre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2002-10-24 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: llandre; +Cc: Andrew Lunn, ecos-discuss, matto
> Can you estimate the memory footprint required by each open socket/file?
I could, but so could you. Read the sources where these two
definitions are used. There will be an array of structures. Do a
sizeof on the structure.
Andrew
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] Maximum number of TCP connections
2002-10-24 3:36 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2002-10-24 5:36 ` llandre
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: llandre @ 2002-10-24 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn; +Cc: ecos-discuss, matto
> > Can you estimate the memory footprint required by each open socket/file?
>
>I could, but so could you. Read the sources where these two
>definitions are used. There will be an array of structures. Do a
>sizeof on the structure.
>
> Andrew
Ok, thanks a lot. As soon as possible, I'll check it out.
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [ECOS] RTP for ecos..
2002-10-24 3:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-10-24 3:32 ` llandre
@ 2002-11-23 6:00 ` A.K.V.SAI JAYRAM
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: A.K.V.SAI JAYRAM @ 2002-11-23 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-discuss
Hello all....
Is there RTP support for ECos..? Has any one tried porting on ECos...?
Rgds
sai
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-23 14:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-24 2:58 [ECOS] Maximum number of TCP connections llandre
2002-10-24 3:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-10-24 3:32 ` llandre
2002-10-24 3:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2002-10-24 5:36 ` llandre
2002-11-23 6:00 ` [ECOS] RTP for ecos A.K.V.SAI JAYRAM
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).