* [ECOS] TCP/IP stack performance
@ 2007-04-10 9:09 Neeraja
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Neeraja @ 2007-04-10 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-discuss
Hi,
I am working on AT91RM9200 board. The TCP/IP stack is working
perfectly fine with this board.
But the problem is that at times the ping reply is taking very
long(some 3 to 4 seconds) which usually will be only 2 or 3ms and is also
timing out in between when it is taking long time to reply back. But the
good thing is that
the TCP/IP stack is not dying completely and is slowly resuming back to
normal after some time( that is it is getting the ping reply within 2 t0 3
ms).
Why is this happening and is there any way that the performance can be
improved?
Anyone suggestions regrading this could be of great help.
Thanks & Regards,
Neeraja.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/TCP-IP-stack-performance-tf3551876.html#a9916193
Sent from the Sourceware - ecos-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] TCP/IP stack performance
[not found] <8CD24E93421F43418C83F16E9342D0340B40D0@nt-email.TELEVIC.COM>
@ 2007-04-14 10:12 ` Jürgen Lambrecht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jürgen Lambrecht @ 2007-04-14 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ecos-discuss
The TCP/IP stack uses threads with the priorities listed below. Maybe
you use the same priorities in your application?
1.12 ecos default priorities
Priorities go from 0 to 31
*priority name* *default* *own* *stack name* *default* *own*
CYGSEM_KERNEL_SYNCH_MUTEX_PRIORITY_INVERSION_PROTOCOL_DEFAULT_PRIORITY 0
CYGPKG_NET_FAST_THREAD_PRIORITY 6 ~
CYGPKG_NET_THREAD_PRIORITY 7 ~
CYGPKG_NET_DHCP_THREAD_PRIORITY 8
CYGINT_NET_IPV6_ROUTING_THREAD_PRIORITY 8
CYGNUM_LIBC_MAIN_THREAD_PRIORITY 10 8
CYGNUM_LIBC_MAIN_DEFAULT_STACK_SIZE 8192 ~
CYGPKG_NET_TFTPD_THREAD_PRIORITY 10 9
CYGPKG_NET_TFTPD_THREAD_STACK_SIZE 3948 4096
CYGNUM_HAL_COMMON_INTERRUPTS_STACK_SIZE 4096 ~
CYGNUM_JFFS2_GC_THREAD_PRIORITY 30
idle thread 31
Neeraja wrote:
> Hi,
> I am working on AT91RM9200 board. The TCP/IP stack is working
> perfectly fine with this board.
> But the problem is that at times the ping reply is taking very
> long(some 3 to 4 seconds) which usually will be only 2 or 3ms and is also
> timing out in between when it is taking long time to reply back. But the
> good thing is that
> the TCP/IP stack is not dying completely and is slowly resuming back to
> normal after some time( that is it is getting the ping reply within 2
t0 3
> ms).
> Why is this happening and is there any way that the performance
can be
> improved?
> Anyone suggestions regrading this could be of great help.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Neeraja.
--
Jürgen Lambrecht
R&D Engineer
Televic Transport Systems
http://www.televic.com
Televic NV / SA (main office)
Leo Bekaertlaan 1
B-8870 Izegem
Tel: +32 (0)51 303045
Fax: +32 (0)51 310670
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-04-14 10:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-10 9:09 [ECOS] TCP/IP stack performance Neeraja
[not found] <8CD24E93421F43418C83F16E9342D0340B40D0@nt-email.TELEVIC.COM>
2007-04-14 10:12 ` Jürgen Lambrecht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).