From: "Dan Conti" <danc@iobjects.com>
To: "eCos mailing list" <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [ECOS] Good board for audio + USB
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D8DFF0AFE792914996F997E68FEC3A48F2E9@bunker.iobjects.com> (raw)
90% of the digital audio players (which typically feature digital audio
and usb) out there use the cirrus design.
From what i understand, the ipaq is very similar to the strongarm
reference designs, but i haven't played with it myself. The advantage of
the ipaq would be that it's available on the street and it's cheap.
There's also a big speed difference between the cirrus parts (which max
out at 90mHz) and the strongarms (which clock at 200mHz or so).
-Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trenton D. Adams [ mailto:tadams@extremeeng.com ]
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 11:54 AM
> To: 'Gary Thomas'
> Cc: 'eCos mailing list'
> Subject: RE: [ECOS] Good board for audio + USB
>
>
> > >
> > > Thanks Gary.
> > >
> > > Where can I get information on the iPAQ? From what Compaq's
> website
> > > says, it's a handheld PC. Isn't there a development board?
> >
> > What more do you want? Do you want to be able to solder
> wires onto
> it?
> > If that's the case, stay away from the iPAQ (and most other PDA
> consumer
> > devices). If all you want to do is experiment with audio and USB,
> etc,
> > then it's quite complete and well packaged.
> >
>
> I'm thinking along the lines of eventually creating some embedded
> systems based off of the development board I use. If the
> iPAQ provides
> circuit diagrams and stuff, then it might be sufficient.
>
> > >
> > > Information on the SA11x0 boards is very hard to find on Intel's
> > website
> > > as well. At least a search came up with something.
> > >
> >
> > Intel doesn't have a good plan here. The Assabet is old and
> probably
> > will
> > be replaced with something new sometime soon, but I don't have any
> solid
> > info about that.
>
> What would be recommend for me based on the information I've given so
> far?
>
>
next reply other threads:[~2001-07-23 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-23 12:41 Dan Conti [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-23 9:27 Trenton D. Adams
2001-07-23 11:08 ` Gary Thomas
2001-07-23 11:37 ` Trenton D. Adams
2001-07-23 11:48 ` Gary Thomas
2001-07-23 11:53 ` Trenton D. Adams
2001-07-23 12:33 ` Jonathan Larmour
2001-07-24 8:41 ` Stefano Costa
2001-07-24 8:44 ` Trenton D. Adams
2001-07-24 9:31 ` Stefano Costa
2001-07-24 9:39 ` Trenton D. Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D8DFF0AFE792914996F997E68FEC3A48F2E9@bunker.iobjects.com \
--to=danc@iobjects.com \
--cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).