public inbox for ecos-maintainers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@jifvik.org>
Cc: Alex Schuilenburg <alexs@ecoscentric.com>,
	eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>,
	Peter Vandenabeele <peter.vandenabeele@mind.be>
Subject: Re: announcements
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1046118857.31018.931.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E5A8133.2000800@jifvik.org>

On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 13:31, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> [ #define MAINTAINERHAT 1 ]
> 
> I should also remind folks that this list is publically archived.
> 
> Alex Schuilenburg wrote:
> > Hi again
> > 
> > Gary Thomas wrote:
> >> Alex,
> >>
> >> I would very much like for you to make public clarification of your
> >> announcement, as you have done to me privately.
> >>
> >> The things I find misleading or missing are:
> >>  * This offer is not coming from the maintainers [at large]
> >>  * Proceeds are to go toward test farm improvements
> >>  * The CDROM contents will be available for [free] download
> >> All that was present in your text was the [seemingly] commercial plug.
> >>
> >> If the above statements are indeed true, I think that they should be
> >> part of the public information.  Even the web page mentioned in
> >> the announcement has nothing to say about them, only how to order.
> > 
> > 
> > Firstly, IMHO putting out a clarification as per my previous response 
> > may appear to indicate a rift between the maintainers at eCosCentric and 
> > the rest of the maintainers.
> 
> I don't think it does. A simple quick clarification sounds like a good idea.
> 
> > As far as I know this is not the case. 
> > There is certainly competition between Mind and eCosCentric, but that is 
> > a seperate issue. How much is your request influenced by your 
> > relationship with Mind?
> 
> Although I didn't catch it when I read the message, I can see how it can 
> be read that way. A simple short follow-up will do no harm.
> 
> > If I were to make any further clarification, I would probably just 
> > reiterate:
> > 
> >   eCosCentric, in conjunction with all the eCos maintainers employed by
> >   eCosCentric, are pleased to announce that they will be selling eCos
> >   2.0 Beta Development CDROMs of the eCos 2.0 Beta release.
> 
> We've been discussing something similar in a private list. It could maybe 
> be better clarified as something like:
> 
> eCosCentric is accepting pre-orders for a physical CD-ROM release of the 
> upcoming public v2.0 beta. Note that this service is independent of the 
> official 2.0 beta release from the eCos maintainers and when the beta is 
> released it will be freely available for download to all.
> 
> *But* I don't think the whole announcement needs to be restated anyway. 
> Just a short simple note that says something like "Just in case of 
> ambiguity, the official eCos 2.0 beta release from the eCos maintainers 
> will be freely available for download to all."
> 
> It would also be a good principle in future for commercial announcements 
> to carry some marker like [COMMERCIAL] in the subject line, particularly 
> for the ecos-announce list. Wish I'd thought of that before :-). Oh well.
> 

Per the private discussion, I agree that this is a reasonable
step forward.

Sorry to have been a pain, but I did read this the wrong way
myself (and I know better).

Thanks.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |
MLB Associates              |  Consulting for the
+1 (970) 229-1963           |    Embedded world
http://www.mlbassoc.com/    |
email: <gary@mlbassoc.com>  |
gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc
------------------------------------------------------------

      reply	other threads:[~2003-02-24 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-24 16:41 announcements Gary Thomas
2003-02-24 18:33 ` announcements Alex Schuilenburg
2003-02-24 20:31   ` announcements Jonathan Larmour
2003-02-24 20:34     ` Gary Thomas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1046118857.31018.931.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org \
    --to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=alexs@ecoscentric.com \
    --cc=ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jifl@jifvik.org \
    --cc=peter.vandenabeele@mind.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).