Re: ecos/packages/hal/arm/at91/eb55/current Change ...

Re: ecos/packages/hal/arm/at91/eb55/current Change ...

[Gary Thomas]

So, do we have status on the CVS machine?  Is it repaired?  Is it safe
to commit once again?

On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 03:28, asl@sources.redhat.com wrote:
> CVSROOT:	/cvs/ecos
> Module name:	ecos
> Changes by:	asl@sourceware.org	2004-04-11 09:28:26
> 
> Modified files:
> 	packages/hal/arm/at91/eb55/current: ChangeLog 
> 	packages/hal/arm/at91/eb55/current/include/pkgconf: 
> 	                                                    mlt_arm_at91_eb55_romram.ldi 
> Removed files:
> 	packages/hal/arm/at91/eb55/current/misc: redboot_ROMRAM.ecm 
> 
> Log message:
> 	* misc/redboot_ROMRAM.ecm: Deleted since this is no longer
> 	supported.
> 	* include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_at91_eb55_romram.ldi: Alter rom_vectors
> 	section to match the startup code for ROMRAM applications
-- 
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates

Re: ecos/packages/hal/arm/at91/eb55/current Change ...

[Bart Veer]

>>>>> "Gary" == Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> writes:

    Gary> So, do we have status on the CVS machine? Is it repaired? Is
    Gary> it safe to commit once again?

Not entirely clear, looking at the overseers list archive. It seems
there was corruption on the cvs-temp partition and this has now been
fixed (http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/overseers/2004-q2/msg00142.html)
However there may still be other problems
(http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/overseers/2004-q2/msg00165.html)

However Chris Faylor has been checking stuff into cygwin CVS in the
last 48 hours. I would take that as a sign that checking stuff into
eCos CVS should be pretty safe as well.

Bart

-- 
Bart Veer                       eCos Configuration Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com/     The eCos and RedBoot experts