* FOSDEM again
@ 2003-01-23 3:44 Jonathan Larmour
2003-01-23 8:28 ` Andrew Lunn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2003-01-23 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eCos Maintainers
I've left it long enough... a grand total of 4 people from
ecos-announce/discuss expressed interest in a meeting. I'm not convinced
this is a critical mass for anything that formal, although there is the
argument that newbies interested in eCos would show up..... but I'm not
sure what we can do for them.
Thoughts?
Jifl
--
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: FOSDEM again
2003-01-23 3:44 FOSDEM again Jonathan Larmour
@ 2003-01-23 8:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2003-01-23 17:01 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2003-01-23 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: eCos Maintainers
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:44:01AM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> I've left it long enough... a grand total of 4 people from
> ecos-announce/discuss expressed interest in a meeting. I'm not convinced
> this is a critical mass for anything that formal, although there is the
> argument that newbies interested in eCos would show up..... but I'm not
> sure what we can do for them.
>
> Thoughts?
I agree. With that few people anything formal is not worth doing. How
many of these people are Mind?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: FOSDEM again
2003-01-23 8:28 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2003-01-23 17:01 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2003-01-23 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn; +Cc: eCos Maintainers
Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:44:01AM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>
>>I've left it long enough... a grand total of 4 people from
>>ecos-announce/discuss expressed interest in a meeting. I'm not convinced
>>this is a critical mass for anything that formal, although there is the
>>argument that newbies interested in eCos would show up..... but I'm not
>>sure what we can do for them.
>>
>>Thoughts?
>
>
> I agree. With that few people anything formal is not worth doing. How
> many of these people are Mind?
Just 1.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ <info@eCosCentric.com>
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-23 17:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-23 3:44 FOSDEM again Jonathan Larmour
2003-01-23 8:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2003-01-23 17:01 ` Jonathan Larmour
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).