Re: New Assignment: AFTEK

[Alex Schuilenburg <alexs@ecoscentric.com>]

Jonathan Larmour wrote:

> Andrew Lunn wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Alex Schuilenburg wrote:
>>
>>> Attached.
>>>
>>> And before anyone asks, this is all that was sent in two seperate 1 
>>> page faxes.  The fax was stored electronically so the address 
>>> resolution is a result of the sender's fax scanner. No list of files 
>>> was provided.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mostly useless...
>>
>> We need to track down what this is for. I've no idea. It does not fit
>> to any contribution i know of which is in the pipeline. 
> 
> 
> Ah, no I know this one (and you can see - barely - my name at the top of 
> the first page). It's this contrib:
> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000068
> which doesn't contain Aftek either.
> 
>> Googling for "aftek infosys eCos" only produces two old hits. If you
>> can make out the senders FAX numbers could you send a FAX back asking
>> them to telephone/email you so we can get this straightened out.
> 
> 
> I'll follow up by e-mail directly.

Ack!  I assume you are going to ask for a second fax with the contents. 
  For the doc to be legal, the address should be clearly visible, which 
it is not in this case.  For now though, a fax should do until we 
receive the original via post when this is should not be an issue since 
I assume it is legible there :-)

-- Alex