Re: New Assignment: AFTEK

[Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com>]

Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Alex Schuilenburg wrote:
> 
>>Attached.
>>
>>And before anyone asks, this is all that was sent in two seperate 1 page 
>>faxes.  The fax was stored electronically so the address resolution is a 
>>result of the sender's fax scanner. No list of files was provided.
> 
> 
> Mostly useless...
> 
> We need to track down what this is for. I've no idea. It does not fit
> to any contribution i know of which is in the pipeline. 

Ah, no I know this one (and you can see - barely - my name at the top of 
the first page). It's this contrib:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000068
which doesn't contain Aftek either.

> Googling for "aftek infosys eCos" only produces two old hits. If you
> can make out the senders FAX numbers could you send a FAX back asking
> them to telephone/email you so we can get this straightened out.

I'll follow up by e-mail directly.

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine