public inbox for ecos-maintainers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Possible eCos copyright infringement
@ 2012-11-14 14:08 Kirhan M
  2012-11-14 17:23 ` Jonathan Larmour
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kirhan M @ 2012-11-14 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ecos-maintainers

http://www.rovingnetworks.com/

mentions on their site at


http://www.rovingnetworks.com/resources/download/46/Development_kit_selector_guide

their WiFly modules use eCos, however, they distribute them without the source code as required by the eCos license. In the same document, they request $2499 (possibly more as they specify that additional support must be purchased, available at $1000 per month) for access to their BIOS that contains eCos.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Possible eCos copyright infringement
  2012-11-14 14:08 Possible eCos copyright infringement Kirhan M
@ 2012-11-14 17:23 ` Jonathan Larmour
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2012-11-14 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kirhan M; +Cc: ecos-maintainers

On 14/11/12 14:08, Kirhan M wrote:
> http://www.rovingnetworks.com/
> 
> mentions on their site at
> 
> 
> http://www.rovingnetworks.com/resources/download/46/Development_kit_selector_guide
>
>  their WiFly modules use eCos, however, they distribute them without the
> source code as required by the eCos license.

They don't strictly have to provide the source code, but then they must at
least provide a written offer to get the source code to anyone who receives
the product.

> In the same document, they
> request $2499 (possibly more as they specify that additional support must
> be purchased, available at $1000 per month) for access to their BIOS that
> contains eCos.

Have you explicitly asked them for a copy of the eCos source code? What did
they say?

Bearing in mind that the eCos license only applies to eCos sources themselves,
or any files derived from eCos sources, it's possible the license is to do
with their proprietary parts, not the eCos-derived parts.

Basically we need a bit more clarity about whether there really is any
infringement going on here. I'm not saying there isn't any infringement, but
it's not clear there is either, presumably hence you saying "possible" in the
subject :).

Jifl


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-14 17:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-14 14:08 Possible eCos copyright infringement Kirhan M
2012-11-14 17:23 ` Jonathan Larmour

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).