public inbox for ecos-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org
To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug 1000819] Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110316120554.22F2E2F80004@mail.ecoscentric.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-1000819-104@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>

Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819

John Dallaway <john@dallaway.org.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|backlog@bugs.ecos.sourcewar |john@dallaway.org.uk
                   |e.org                       |
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #11 from John Dallaway <john@dallaway.org.uk> 2011-03-16 12:05:52 GMT ---
Let's try to push through with review and get it checked in. I've invited all
interested parties to add themselves to the CC list and add their own comment
where necessary/appropriate.

Evgeniy, the use of multiple patches is a great help - thank you!

Let's start with the ARM7/ARM9 abstraction work (patch 1). This looks to be a
case of moving the existing HAL cache macros (which are not appropriate for
AT91SAM9) from the AT91 variant package to a new ARM7 package. I assume that
there is nothing AT91-specific in the new package so it could be used by any
other ARM7 ports in the future. Please confirm.

As it stands, this patch should only affect AT91 targets. The risk of breaking
other AT91 target support is small since there does not appear to be any
changes to the macros themselves. There is a risk of breaking compatibility
with non-contributed ports to AT91SAM7 hardware but the effort in fixing such
breakage should be limited to adding the new ARM7 package to the target
description in ecos.db. I don't have a problem with this.

Is there any other code in the existing AT91 variant HAL which might not be
appropriate for AT91SAM9? Any other comments on patch 1?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-16 12:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-06 17:42 [Bug 1000819] New: " bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:46 ` [Bug 1000819] " bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:59 ` [Bug 1000819] New: " Evgeniy Dushistov
2009-09-14  7:25 ` John Dallaway
2010-02-24 11:54 ` [Bug 1000819] " bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 12:06 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2011-03-16 16:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 16:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 16:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 17:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 17:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 17:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 18:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 19:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 13:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 14:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 14:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 14:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 14:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 14:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 15:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 15:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-17 22:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-17 23:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-18 17:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-18 19:00   ` Grant Edwards
2011-05-18 21:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-19 12:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-19 12:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-19 13:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-24 18:28 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110316120554.22F2E2F80004@mail.ecoscentric.com \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org \
    --cc=ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).