public inbox for ecos-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com>
To: ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Bug 1000819] Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 19:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ir14gg$hd2$2@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110518171954.DA7DB2F7800B@mail.ecoscentric.com>

On 2011-05-18, bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org <bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org> wrote:
> Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819
>
> --- Comment #28 from Daniel Helgason <dhelgason@shaw.ca> 2011-05-18 18:19:50 BST ---
> (In reply to comment #11)
>> Let's try to push through with review and get it checked in. I've invited all
>> interested parties to add themselves to the CC list and add their own comment
>> where necessary/appropriate.
>> 
>> Evgeniy, the use of multiple patches is a great help - thank you!
>> 
>> Let's start with the ARM7/ARM9 abstraction work (patch 1). This looks to be a
>> case of moving the existing HAL cache macros (which are not appropriate for
>> AT91SAM9) from the AT91 variant package to a new ARM7 package. I assume that
>> there is nothing AT91-specific in the new package so it could be used by any
>> other ARM7 ports in the future. Please confirm.
>> ...
>
> Is is correct to have AT91 as a variant? I see it more as a package that
> defines a set of common I/O and provides macros for common AT91 stuff.

That makes a lot of sense to me.  In reality, "AT91" is a common set
of peripherals that are used on a variety of Atmel parts having
several different architectures, varieties, and platforms.

> Would it
> make sense if things were arranged more like:
>
> ARM (arch)
> +- ARM7 (variant)
>    + SAM7S (platform)
>    + SAM7X (platform)
>    + Other Non-AT91 chip (platform)
>    + SAM7S-EK (board)
>    + SAM7X-EK (board)
>    ...etc.
> +  ARM9 (variant)
>    + SAM9263 (platform)
>    + SAM9G20 (platform)
>    + SAM9RL64 (platform)
>    + Other Non-AT91 chip (platform)
>    + SAM9G20-EK (board)
>    + SAM99RL-EK (board
>    ...etc.
> + AT91 (I/O support package)
>
> Or maybe I'm just confused about the relationship between arch, var,
> and plf?

You wouldn't be the first. :)

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! Look into my eyes and
                                  at               try to forget that you have
                              gmail.com            a Macy's charge card!

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-18 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-06 17:42 [Bug 1000819] New: " bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:46 ` [Bug 1000819] " bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-09-06 17:59 ` [Bug 1000819] New: " Evgeniy Dushistov
2009-09-14  7:25 ` John Dallaway
2010-02-24 11:54 ` [Bug 1000819] " bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 12:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 16:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 16:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 16:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 17:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 17:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 17:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 18:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-16 19:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 13:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 14:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 14:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 14:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 14:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 14:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 15:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-22 15:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-17 22:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-17 23:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-18 17:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-18 19:00   ` Grant Edwards [this message]
2011-05-18 21:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-19 12:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-19 12:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-19 13:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-05-24 18:28 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='ir14gg$hd2$2@dough.gmane.org' \
    --to=grant.b.edwards@gmail.com \
    --cc=ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).