* Odd bug from Stack Overflow
@ 2018-03-18 15:40 Steve Kargl
2018-03-18 16:03 ` Steve Kargl
2018-03-18 17:12 ` Thomas König
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kargl @ 2018-03-18 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fortran
So, who knows how the scalarizer works?
This code
program test
implicit none
integer, parameter :: n = 65536
integer, dimension(n) :: y
integer*4 :: i
y = (/ (1, i=1, n) /)
if (y(2) /= 1) stop 1
end program test
generates a loops that does the right thing.
offset.1 = 0;
shadow_loopvar.2 = 1;
while (1)
{
if (shadow_loopvar.2 > 65536) goto L.1;
(*(integer(kind=4)[65536] * restrict) atmp.0.data)[offset.1] = 1;
offset.1 = offset.1 + 1;
shadow_loopvar.2 = shadow_loopvar.2 + 1;
}
L.1:;
Clearly, 1 is being assigned to each element of the array 'y'. Now
change the type of 'y' to real.
offset.1 = 0;
(*(real(kind=4)[65536] * restrict) atmp.0.data)[offset.1] = 1.0e+0;
offset.1 = offset.1 + 1;
{
integer(kind=4) S.2;
S.2 = 0;
while (1)
{
if (S.2 > 65535) goto L.1;
y[S.2] = (*(real(kind=4)[65536] * restrict) atmp.0.data)[S.2];
S.2 = S.2 + 1;
}
L.1:;
}
The value of 1.0 is assigned to the first element of atmp, a
temporary array. Then the loop assigns the values from
temporary array 'atmp'. The problem is atmp(2:65536) have
never been set. I was expecting the -fdump-tree-original for
the integer and real codes to look substantially the same.
Something has gone sideways. Anyone have a good guess where?
--
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Odd bug from Stack Overflow
2018-03-18 15:40 Odd bug from Stack Overflow Steve Kargl
@ 2018-03-18 16:03 ` Steve Kargl
2018-03-18 17:12 ` Thomas König
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kargl @ 2018-03-18 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fortran
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 08:39:58AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> So, who knows how the scalarizer works?
>
> This code
>
> program test
> implicit none
> integer, parameter :: n = 65536
> integer, dimension(n) :: y
> integer*4 :: i
> y = (/ (1, i=1, n) /)
> if (y(2) /= 1) stop 1
> end program test
>
> generates a loops that does the right thing.
>
> offset.1 = 0;
> shadow_loopvar.2 = 1;
> while (1)
> {
> if (shadow_loopvar.2 > 65536) goto L.1;
> (*(integer(kind=4)[65536] * restrict) atmp.0.data)[offset.1] = 1;
> offset.1 = offset.1 + 1;
> shadow_loopvar.2 = shadow_loopvar.2 + 1;
> }
> L.1:;
Whoops left out the copying of atmp to y.
{
integer(kind=4) S.3;
S.3 = 0;
while (1)
{
if (S.3 > 65535) goto L.2;
y[S.3] = (*(integer(kind=4)[65536] * restrict) atmp.0.data)[S.3];
S.3 = S.3 + 1;
}
L.2:;
}
>
> Clearly, 1 is being assigned to each element of the array 'y'. Now
> change the type of 'y' to real.
>
> offset.1 = 0;
> (*(real(kind=4)[65536] * restrict) atmp.0.data)[offset.1] = 1.0e+0;
> offset.1 = offset.1 + 1;
> {
> integer(kind=4) S.2;
>
> S.2 = 0;
> while (1)
> {
> if (S.2 > 65535) goto L.1;
> y[S.2] = (*(real(kind=4)[65536] * restrict) atmp.0.data)[S.2];
> S.2 = S.2 + 1;
> }
> L.1:;
> }
>
> The value of 1.0 is assigned to the first element of atmp, a
> temporary array. Then the loop assigns the values from
> temporary array 'atmp'. The problem is atmp(2:65536) have
> never been set. I was expecting the -fdump-tree-original for
> the integer and real codes to look substantially the same.
> Something has gone sideways. Anyone have a good guess where?
>
> --
> Steve
--
Steve
20170425 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWUpyCsUKR4
20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Odd bug from Stack Overflow
2018-03-18 15:40 Odd bug from Stack Overflow Steve Kargl
2018-03-18 16:03 ` Steve Kargl
@ 2018-03-18 17:12 ` Thomas König
2018-03-18 17:19 ` Steve Kargl
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas König @ 2018-03-18 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sgk, fortran
Hi Steve,
This looks like a missing conversion somewhere,
because this works:
program test
implicit none
integer, parameter :: n = 65536
real, dimension(n) :: y
integer :: i
y = (/ (1.0, i=1, n) /)
print *,y(2)
if (y(2) /= 1) stop 1
end program test
Also, n=65536 is a limit... setting n=2**16-1 actually
works as expected with the orginal test case.
This looks like a resolution problem, not something
in the scalarizer. Can you open a PR?
Regards
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Odd bug from Stack Overflow
2018-03-18 17:12 ` Thomas König
@ 2018-03-18 17:19 ` Steve Kargl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kargl @ 2018-03-18 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas König; +Cc: fortran
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 06:12:23PM +0100, Thomas König wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> This looks like a missing conversion somewhere,
> because this works:
>
> program test
> implicit none
> integer, parameter :: n = 65536
> real, dimension(n) :: y
> integer :: i
> y = (/ (1.0, i=1, n) /)
> print *,y(2)
> if (y(2) /= 1) stop 1
> end program test
>
> Also, n=65536 is a limit... setting n=2**16-1 actually
> works as expected with the orginal test case.
Yes, n=2**16-1 works because gfortran switches over from
expanding the array constructor into a static temporary
variable to scalarizing the implied-do-loop at 2**16. It
is a trade-off we made a long time ago for
integer, parameter :: i(somebignumber) = [(i,i=1,somebignumer)]
See -fmax-array-constructor= option.
> This looks like a resolution problem, not something
> in the scalarizer. Can you open a PR?
Yes.
--
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-03-18 17:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-03-18 15:40 Odd bug from Stack Overflow Steve Kargl
2018-03-18 16:03 ` Steve Kargl
2018-03-18 17:12 ` Thomas König
2018-03-18 17:19 ` Steve Kargl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).