public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com>,
	NightStrike via Fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Toon Moene <toon@moene.org>
Cc: Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org>,
	gfortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Team Collaboration Considerations
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 19:33:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <67368315-70A6-4D5D-9CCE-0890EE0FEB0E@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF1jjLsm4tV6NDAyfaPX7jXJx+RJtO4ioLYcgFurxEN1U751Pw@mail.gmail.com>

On 19 January 2023 13:52:55 CET, NightStrike via Fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

>You can, and people naturally do this, and I think it's great, but
>there's usually a response from someone saying "post that to the
>mailing list instead".

The mailing list has a 20-30 year history with reasoning about what currently is in the tree. I do think it is valuable to reason about patches publically for others to see. And I'm aware that this might not be regarded fancy nowadays by everyone.

But that does not mean that using other means to collaborate should not be used by some. Be it comp.lang.fortran, a webchat.oftc, or other means, that's all fine of course.

patches currently are handled differently, but I don't think that is a problem isn't it.
Just post final patches to the list as long as that is regarded the way to do final review and document approval.

cheers,

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-19 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-04  3:52 Jerry D
2022-12-04 14:16 ` Benson Muite
2022-12-08  1:54   ` Jerry D
2022-12-08  4:12     ` Benson Muite
2022-12-08 16:27     ` Steve Kargl
2022-12-08 17:25       ` Tobias Burnus
2022-12-10 18:15         ` Jerry D
2022-12-08 19:14       ` Holcomb, Katherine A (kah3f)
2022-12-09 19:36         ` Toon Moene
2022-12-09 21:56           ` Paul Richard Thomas
2022-12-09 22:10             ` Toon Moene
2022-12-10 20:10         ` Jerry D
2022-12-10 21:09           ` Steve Kargl
2022-12-11 17:37             ` Holcomb, Katherine A (kah3f)
2022-12-10 21:11         ` Thomas Koenig
2022-12-13  8:10 ` Janne Blomqvist
2022-12-13 12:22   ` Jerry D
2022-12-26 10:19   ` NightStrike
2023-01-19  5:00     ` Benson Muite
2023-01-19 12:28       ` NightStrike
2023-01-19 12:46         ` Toon Moene
2023-01-19 12:52           ` NightStrike
2023-01-19 18:33             ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [this message]
2023-01-19 19:03               ` NightStrike
2023-01-20  6:11                 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-01-20  6:21                 ` Benson Muite
2023-01-21  4:50                   ` Jerry D
2022-12-08 21:27 Harald Anlauf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=67368315-70A6-4D5D-9CCE-0890EE0FEB0E@gmail.com \
    --to=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
    --cc=benson_muite@emailplus.org \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nightstrike@gmail.com \
    --cc=toon@moene.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).