From: "Zhu, Lipeng" <lipeng.zhu@intel.com>
To: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
"fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"Deng, Pan" <pan.deng@intel.com>,
"rep.dot.nop@gmail.com" <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>,
"Li, Tianyou" <tianyou.li@intel.com>,
"tkoenig@netcologne.de" <tkoenig@netcologne.de>,
"Guo, Wangyang" <wangyang.guo@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7] libgfortran: Replace mutex with rwlock
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:28:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH7PR11MB605696E8818676DA7D17A8AE9F8CA@PH7PR11MB6056.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sf45su42.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net>
On 2023/12/14 4:52, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi Lipeng!
>
> On 2023-12-12T02:05:26+0000, "Zhu, Lipeng" <lipeng.zhu@intel.com> wrote:
> > On 2023/12/12 1:45, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 7:25 PM Zhu, Lipeng <lipeng.zhu@intel.com>
> wrote:
> >> > On 2023/12/9 23:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> > > On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 10:39:45AM -0500, Lipeng Zhu wrote:
> >> > > > This patch try to introduce the rwlock and split the read/write
> >> > > > to unit_root tree and unit_cache with rwlock instead of the
> >> > > > mutex to increase CPU efficiency. In the get_gfc_unit function,
> >> > > > the percentage to step into the insert_unit function is around
> >> > > > 30%, in most instances, we can get the unit in the phase of
> >> > > > reading the unit_cache or unit_root tree. So split the
> >> > > > read/write phase by rwlock would be an approach to make it more
> parallel.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > BTW, the IPC metrics can gain around 9x in our test server with
> >> > > > 220 cores. The benchmark we used is
> >> > > > https://github.com/rwesson/NEAT
>
> >> > > Ok for trunk, thanks.
>
> >> > Thanks! Looking forward to landing to trunk.
>
> >> Pushed for you.
>
> > Thanks for everyone's patience and help, really appreciate that!
>
> Congratulations on your first contribution to GCC (as far as I can tell)!
> :-)
>
>
> I've just filed <https://gcc.gnu.org/PR113005>
> "'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90', 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_3.f90' execution
> test timeouts".
> Would you be able to look into that?
>
>
> Grüße
> Thomas
> -----------------
> Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201,
> 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer:
> Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München;
> Registergericht München, HRB 106955
Hi Thomas,
Sure, I will look into that.
BTW, I didn’t have the PowerPC in hands, do you mind granting the access of your
test environment to me to help reproduce the issue?
Lipeng Zhu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-14 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-09 2:32 [PATCH v4] " Zhu, Lipeng
2023-05-16 7:08 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-05-23 2:53 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-05-24 19:18 ` Thomas Koenig
2023-08-18 3:06 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-09-14 8:33 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-10-23 1:21 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-10-23 5:52 ` Thomas Koenig
2023-10-23 23:59 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-11-01 10:14 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-11-02 9:58 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-11-23 9:36 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-07 5:18 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-08-18 3:18 ` [PATCH v6] " Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-08 10:19 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-12-09 15:13 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-09 15:39 ` [PATCH v7] " Lipeng Zhu
2023-12-09 15:23 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-12-10 3:25 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-11 17:45 ` H.J. Lu
2023-12-12 2:05 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-13 20:52 ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-12-14 2:28 ` Zhu, Lipeng [this message]
2023-12-14 12:29 ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-12-14 12:39 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-12-15 5:43 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-21 11:42 ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-12-22 6:48 ` Lipeng Zhu
2024-01-03 9:14 ` Lipeng Zhu
2024-01-17 13:25 ` Lipeng Zhu
2023-12-14 15:50 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2023-12-15 11:31 ` Lipeng Zhu
2023-12-15 19:23 ` Richard Earnshaw
2024-01-02 11:57 ` Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy
2024-01-03 1:02 ` Lipeng Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH7PR11MB605696E8818676DA7D17A8AE9F8CA@PH7PR11MB6056.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=lipeng.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=pan.deng@intel.com \
--cc=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tianyou.li@intel.com \
--cc=tkoenig@netcologne.de \
--cc=wangyang.guo@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).