public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lipeng Zhu <lipeng.zhu@intel.com>
To: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, "Deng,
	Pan" <pan.deng@intel.com>,
	rep.dot.nop@gmail.com, "Li, Tianyou" <tianyou.li@intel.com>,
	tkoenig@netcologne.de, "Guo, Wangyang" <wangyang.guo@intel.com>,
	Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] libgfortran: Replace mutex with rwlock
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 21:25:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac0dac34-4cc7-493e-b7ca-4272b346b81a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36133fcc-5cb7-48aa-8bee-20634fd1d1de@intel.com>



On 1/3/2024 5:14 PM, Lipeng Zhu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/12/21 19:42, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 2023-12-13T21:52:29+0100, I wrote:
>>> On 2023-12-12T02:05:26+0000, "Zhu, Lipeng" <lipeng.zhu@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2023/12/12 1:45, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 7:25 PM Zhu, Lipeng <lipeng.zhu@intel.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2023/12/9 23:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 10:39:45AM -0500, Lipeng Zhu wrote:
>>>>>>>> This patch try to introduce the rwlock and split the read/write to
>>>>>>>> unit_root tree and unit_cache with rwlock instead of the mutex to
>>>>>>>> increase CPU efficiency. In the get_gfc_unit function, the
>>>>>>>> percentage to step into the insert_unit function is around 30%, in
>>>>>>>> most instances, we can get the unit in the phase of reading the
>>>>>>>> unit_cache or unit_root tree. So split the read/write phase by
>>>>>>>> rwlock would be an approach to make it more parallel.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW, the IPC metrics can gain around 9x in our test server with
>>>>>>>> 220 cores. The benchmark we used is
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rwesson/NEAT
>>>
>>>>>>> Ok for trunk, thanks.
>>>
>>>>>> Thanks! Looking forward to landing to trunk.
>>>
>>>>> Pushed for you.
>>
>>> I've just filed <https://gcc.gnu.org/PR113005>
>>> "'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90', 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_3.f90' 
>>> execution test timeouts".
>>> Would you be able to look into that?
>>
>> See my update in there.
>>
>>
>> Grüße
>>   Thomas
>> -----------------
>> Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 
>> 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; 
>> Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: 
>> München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955
>>
> 
> Updated in https://gcc.gnu.org/PR113005. Could you help to verify if the 
> draft patch would fix the execution test timeout issue on your side?
> 

Hi Thomas,

Any feedback from your side?

Regards,
Lipeng Zhu




  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-17 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-09  2:32 [PATCH v4] " Zhu, Lipeng
2023-05-16  7:08 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-05-23  2:53   ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-05-24 19:18     ` Thomas Koenig
2023-08-18  3:06       ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-09-14  8:33         ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-10-23  1:21           ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-10-23  5:52             ` Thomas Koenig
2023-10-23 23:59               ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-11-01 10:14                 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-11-02  9:58                   ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-11-23  9:36                     ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-07  5:18                       ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-08-18  3:18       ` [PATCH v6] " Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-08 10:19         ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-12-09 15:13           ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-09 15:39             ` [PATCH v7] " Lipeng Zhu
2023-12-09 15:23               ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-12-10  3:25                 ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-11 17:45                   ` H.J. Lu
2023-12-12  2:05                     ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-13 20:52                       ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-12-14  2:28                         ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-14 12:29                           ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-12-14 12:39                             ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-12-15  5:43                               ` Zhu, Lipeng
2023-12-21 11:42                         ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-12-22  6:48                           ` Lipeng Zhu
2024-01-03  9:14                           ` Lipeng Zhu
2024-01-17 13:25                             ` Lipeng Zhu [this message]
2023-12-14 15:50               ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2023-12-15 11:31                 ` Lipeng Zhu
2023-12-15 19:23                   ` Richard Earnshaw
2024-01-02 11:57                     ` Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy
2024-01-03  1:02                       ` Lipeng Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac0dac34-4cc7-493e-b7ca-4272b346b81a@intel.com \
    --to=lipeng.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=pan.deng@intel.com \
    --cc=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=tianyou.li@intel.com \
    --cc=tkoenig@netcologne.de \
    --cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=wangyang.guo@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).