public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] PR fortran/102716 - ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind
@ 2021-10-13 19:36 Harald Anlauf
  2021-10-14  6:00 ` Thomas Koenig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Harald Anlauf @ 2021-10-13 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fortran, gcc-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 306 bytes --]

Dear Fortranners,

another simple and obvious fix: we need to reorder the argument checks
to the SHAPE intrinsic so that invalid KIND arguments can be detected.

Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline?

As I consider this a safe fix, I'd like to backport to suitable branches.

Thanks,
Harald


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: pr102716.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1647 bytes --]

Fortran: fix order of checks for the SHAPE intrinsic

gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

	PR fortran/102716
	* check.c (gfc_check_shape): Reorder checks so that invalid KIND
	arguments can be detected.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR fortran/102716
	* gfortran.dg/shape_10.f90: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c
index 677209ee95e..cfaf9d26bbc 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/check.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/check.c
@@ -5086,6 +5086,13 @@ gfc_check_shape (gfc_expr *source, gfc_expr *kind)
   if (gfc_invalid_null_arg (source))
     return false;

+  if (!kind_check (kind, 1, BT_INTEGER))
+    return false;
+  if (kind && !gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_F2003, "%qs intrinsic "
+			       "with KIND argument at %L",
+			       gfc_current_intrinsic, &kind->where))
+    return false;
+
   if (source->rank == 0 || source->expr_type != EXPR_VARIABLE)
     return true;

@@ -5098,13 +5105,6 @@ gfc_check_shape (gfc_expr *source, gfc_expr *kind)
       return false;
     }

-  if (!kind_check (kind, 1, BT_INTEGER))
-    return false;
-  if (kind && !gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_F2003, "%qs intrinsic "
-			       "with KIND argument at %L",
-			       gfc_current_intrinsic, &kind->where))
-    return false;
-
   return true;
 }

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/shape_10.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/shape_10.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4943c21b1d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/shape_10.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR fortran/102716
+
+program p
+  integer, parameter :: a(1) = shape([2], [1]) ! { dg-error "must be a scalar" }
+end

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/102716 - ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind
  2021-10-13 19:36 [PATCH] PR fortran/102716 - ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind Harald Anlauf
@ 2021-10-14  6:00 ` Thomas Koenig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Koenig @ 2021-10-14  6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Harald Anlauf, fortran, gcc-patches

Hi Harald,

> another simple and obvious fix: we need to reorder the argument checks
> to the SHAPE intrinsic so that invalid KIND arguments can be detected.
> 
> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline?
> 
> As I consider this a safe fix, I'd like to backport to suitable branches.

Also OK for both.

Thanks a lot for the patch!

Best regards

	Thomas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-14  6:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-13 19:36 [PATCH] PR fortran/102716 - ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind Harald Anlauf
2021-10-14  6:00 ` Thomas Koenig

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).