public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Fortran: prevent redundant integer division truncation warnings [PR108592]
@ 2023-01-30 21:55 Harald Anlauf
  2023-02-05 19:33 ` *PING* " Harald Anlauf
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Harald Anlauf @ 2023-01-30 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fortran, gcc-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 398 bytes --]

Dear Fortranners,

the subject says it all: in some cases we emit redundant integer division
truncation warnings (2 or 4), where just one would have been sufficient.
This is solved by using gfc_warning instead of gfc_warning_now.

The testcase uses a suggestion by Andrew to verify that we get the
desired warning exactly once.

Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline?

Thanks,
Harald


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: pr108592.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1871 bytes --]

From 8340523c8df8edd008174d44e87c0fa54b58b2c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 22:46:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: prevent redundant integer division truncation
 warnings [PR108592]

gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

	PR fortran/108592
	* arith.cc (gfc_arith_divide): Emit integer division truncation
	warnings using gfc_warning instead of gfc_warning_now to prevent
	redundant messages.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR fortran/108592
	* gfortran.dg/pr108592.f90: New test.
---
 gcc/fortran/arith.cc                   | 2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr108592.f90 | 8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr108592.f90

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/arith.cc b/gcc/fortran/arith.cc
index 6de6d21c73d..d0d1c0b03d2 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/arith.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/arith.cc
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ gfc_arith_divide (gfc_expr *op1, gfc_expr *op2, gfc_expr **resultp)
 	    {
 	      char *p;
 	      p = mpz_get_str (NULL, 10, result->value.integer);
-	      gfc_warning_now (OPT_Winteger_division, "Integer division "
+	      gfc_warning (OPT_Winteger_division, "Integer division "
 			       "truncated to constant %qs at %L", p,
 			       &op1->where);
 	      free (p);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr108592.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr108592.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..224b1d8d1fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr108592.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! { dg-options "-Winteger-division" }
+! PR fortran/108592 - warn only once for truncation of integer division
+
+program foo
+  if (8 < (20/9)) stop 1 ! { dg-bogus "Integer division.*Integer division" }
+! { dg-message "Integer division truncated" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+end program
--
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* *PING* [PATCH] Fortran: prevent redundant integer division truncation warnings [PR108592]
  2023-01-30 21:55 [PATCH] Fortran: prevent redundant integer division truncation warnings [PR108592] Harald Anlauf
@ 2023-02-05 19:33 ` Harald Anlauf
  2023-02-05 21:46   ` Jerry D
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Harald Anlauf @ 2023-02-05 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fortran, gcc-patches

Early gentle ping.

Am 30.01.23 um 22:55 schrieb Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches:
> Dear Fortranners,
>
> the subject says it all: in some cases we emit redundant integer division
> truncation warnings (2 or 4), where just one would have been sufficient.
> This is solved by using gfc_warning instead of gfc_warning_now.
>
> The testcase uses a suggestion by Andrew to verify that we get the
> desired warning exactly once.
>
> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline?
>
> Thanks,
> Harald
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: *PING* [PATCH] Fortran: prevent redundant integer division truncation warnings [PR108592]
  2023-02-05 19:33 ` *PING* " Harald Anlauf
@ 2023-02-05 21:46   ` Jerry D
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jerry D @ 2023-02-05 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Harald Anlauf, fortran, gcc-patches

On 2/5/23 11:33 AM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
> Early gentle ping.
> 
> Am 30.01.23 um 22:55 schrieb Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches:
>> Dear Fortranners,
>>
>> the subject says it all: in some cases we emit redundant integer division
>> truncation warnings (2 or 4), where just one would have been sufficient.
>> This is solved by using gfc_warning instead of gfc_warning_now.
>>
>> The testcase uses a suggestion by Andrew to verify that we get the
>> desired warning exactly once.
>>
>> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Harald
>>
> 

The patch is gentle enough to be OK to commit.

Thanks,

Jerry

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-05 21:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-30 21:55 [PATCH] Fortran: prevent redundant integer division truncation warnings [PR108592] Harald Anlauf
2023-02-05 19:33 ` *PING* " Harald Anlauf
2023-02-05 21:46   ` Jerry D

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).