public inbox for frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug general/3835] New: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
@ 2007-01-05 21:33 npremji at redhat dot com
  2007-01-05 21:34 ` [Bug general/3835] " npremji at redhat dot com
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: npremji at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-05 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frysk-bugzilla

./frysk-core/TestRunner -r 100 -console frysk=FINEST
frysk.proc.TestAbandon.testStressAbandon

produces the error:

testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
   at frysk.sys.Errno.throwErrno(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace$PtraceThread.notifyPtraceThread(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace.detach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask.sendDetach(TestRunner)
   at
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Attached$WaitForUnblock.handleDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.performDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$Detaching.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$3.handleDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Proc$7.execute(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestAbandon.testStressAbandon(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

-- 
           Summary: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such
                    process
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
  2007-01-05 21:33 [Bug general/3835] New: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process npremji at redhat dot com
@ 2007-01-05 21:34 ` npremji at redhat dot com
  2007-01-05 21:36 ` npremji at redhat dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: npremji at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-05 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frysk-bugzilla


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-05 21:34 -------
*** Bug 3822 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
  2007-01-05 21:33 [Bug general/3835] New: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process npremji at redhat dot com
  2007-01-05 21:34 ` [Bug general/3835] " npremji at redhat dot com
@ 2007-01-05 21:36 ` npremji at redhat dot com
  2007-01-05 21:48 ` npremji at redhat dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: npremji at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-05 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frysk-bugzilla


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-05 21:36 -------
*** Bug 3836 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
  2007-01-05 21:33 [Bug general/3835] New: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process npremji at redhat dot com
  2007-01-05 21:34 ` [Bug general/3835] " npremji at redhat dot com
  2007-01-05 21:36 ` npremji at redhat dot com
@ 2007-01-05 21:48 ` npremji at redhat dot com
  2007-01-10  6:47 ` cagney at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: npremji at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-05 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frysk-bugzilla


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-05 21:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=1476)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1476&action=view)
compressed Log output of testStressAbandon


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
  2007-01-05 21:33 [Bug general/3835] New: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process npremji at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-01-05 21:48 ` npremji at redhat dot com
@ 2007-01-10  6:47 ` cagney at redhat dot com
  2007-01-10 15:18 ` npremji at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cagney at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-10  6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frysk-bugzilla


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-10 06:46 -------
Nurdin,
How hard would it be to put the stress test in a StressAbandon file?  That way
it's only run when --stress is specified to TestRunner/junit.
Andrew

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
  2007-01-05 21:33 [Bug general/3835] New: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process npremji at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-01-10  6:47 ` cagney at redhat dot com
@ 2007-01-10 15:18 ` npremji at redhat dot com
  2007-01-11 11:53 ` cagney at redhat dot com
  2007-01-11 16:00 ` npremji at redhat dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: npremji at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-10 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frysk-bugzilla


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-10 15:18 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Nurdin,
> How hard would it be to put the stress test in a StressAbandon file?  That way
> it's only run when --stress is specified to TestRunner/junit.
> Andrew

Done, new file StressTestAbandon contains stressTestAbandon.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
  2007-01-05 21:33 [Bug general/3835] New: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process npremji at redhat dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-01-10 15:18 ` npremji at redhat dot com
@ 2007-01-11 11:53 ` cagney at redhat dot com
  2007-01-11 16:00 ` npremji at redhat dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cagney at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-11 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frysk-bugzilla


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-11 11:53 -------
Did you mean "StressAbandon.java" and testAbandon()?  Otherwize the --stress
flag won't make the test run.
 

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
  2007-01-05 21:33 [Bug general/3835] New: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process npremji at redhat dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-01-11 11:53 ` cagney at redhat dot com
@ 2007-01-11 16:00 ` npremji at redhat dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: npremji at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-11 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frysk-bugzilla


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-11 15:59 -------
Uh yeah, StressTestAbandon.java and testStressAbandon() is what I had submitted
it as, it runs with TestRunner --stress

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-11 16:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-05 21:33 [Bug general/3835] New: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process npremji at redhat dot com
2007-01-05 21:34 ` [Bug general/3835] " npremji at redhat dot com
2007-01-05 21:36 ` npremji at redhat dot com
2007-01-05 21:48 ` npremji at redhat dot com
2007-01-10  6:47 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-01-10 15:18 ` npremji at redhat dot com
2007-01-11 11:53 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-01-11 16:00 ` npremji at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).