[Bug general/4056] New: dwarf_whatform.c doesn't compile with gcc 4.3 (svn)

[Bug general/4056] New: dwarf_whatform.c doesn't compile with gcc 4.3 (svn)

[mark at klomp dot org]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1485 bytes --]

make[5]: Entering directory `/home/mark/src/frysk-obj/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw'
if gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DIS_LIBDW -I.
-I../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw -I.. -I.
-I../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw
-I../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw/../libelf -I..
-I../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw/../lib    -Wall -Werror
-Wshadow -Wunused -Wformat=2 -Wextra -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -MT dwarf_whatform.o -MD
-MP -MF ".deps/dwarf_whatform.Tpo" -c -o dwarf_whatform.o
../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw/dwarf_whatform.c; \
        then mv -f ".deps/dwarf_whatform.Tpo" ".deps/dwarf_whatform.Po"; else rm
-f ".deps/dwarf_whatform.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw/dwarf_whatform.c:61: error:
redefinition of ‘dwarf_whatform’
../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw/libdw.h:628: error: previous
definition of ‘dwarf_whatform’ was here
make[5]: *** [dwarf_whatform.o] Error 1

-- 
           Summary: dwarf_whatform.c doesn't compile with gcc 4.3 (svn)
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4056

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug general/4056] dwarf_whatform.c doesn't compile with gcc 4.3 (svn)

[mark at klomp dot org]

------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-15 20:11 -------
Just for the record this was with an SVN version of gcc (4.3) which some claim
has broken inline semantics. This hasn't any priority at the moment.

I was only trying this out because I wanted to try the new gcj. But there is a
backport of that available for 4.1 which I will use so as to not be tripped over
any changes in the C and C++ compilers. See
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/redhat/gcc-4_1-branch-java-merge-20070117

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4056

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.