public inbox for frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug general/4298] New: Unexplained "BlockedSignal" did not handle handleRemoval
@ 2007-03-30 14:59 mark at klomp dot org
  2007-08-20 10:34 ` [Bug general/4298] " mark at klomp dot org
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-03-30 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frysk-bugzilla

Mike Cvet reported the following in bug #3705:

{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3967ceb5,pid=26079,tid=26079,state=blockedContinue} 
in state "BlockedSignal" did not handle handleRemoval

frysk.proc.State.unhandled(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.TaskState.handleRemoval(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.Task.performRemoval(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProc.sendRefresh(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost.sendRefresh(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHostState$1.handleRefresh(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.Host$1.execute(FryskGui)
frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui)
frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui)
frysk.gui.Gui$3.run(FryskGui)
java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh)

This should not happen (tm).
This means a task got killed and disappeared while we thought it we got it
blocked. We only handle such a case if we are in the detached state.

-- 
           Summary: Unexplained "BlockedSignal" did not handle handleRemoval
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4298

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug general/4298] Unexplained "BlockedSignal" did not handle handleRemoval
  2007-03-30 14:59 [Bug general/4298] New: Unexplained "BlockedSignal" did not handle handleRemoval mark at klomp dot org
@ 2007-08-20 10:34 ` mark at klomp dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-08-20 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frysk-bugzilla


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-08-20 10:34 -------
This could happen if the program was terminated (like kill -9), and we should
handle that case. But that doesn't seem to be the case here.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4298

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-20 10:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-30 14:59 [Bug general/4298] New: Unexplained "BlockedSignal" did not handle handleRemoval mark at klomp dot org
2007-08-20 10:34 ` [Bug general/4298] " mark at klomp dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).