public inbox for frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug general/4847] New: testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException @ 2007-07-26 15:29 mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-10 11:21 ` [Bug general/4847] testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException mark at klomp dot org ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-07-26 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: frysk-bugzilla Since kernel 2.6.22.1-27.fc7 (x86 SMP) this test fails because the abort(), which should never be reached is triggered in funit-breakpoints: // Generating a trap event ourselves, simulating "bad code". Setup // a sigsetjump so we can handle it and return from this function // safely when the signal handler uses longjmp. On some // architectures the PC isn't incremented on invallid/trapping // instructions. So this makes sure we skip it when we return. if (sigsetjmp (env, 1) == 0) { send_trap++; #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) asm("int3"); #elif defined(__powerpc64__) || defined(__powerpc__) asm(".long 0x7d821008"); #else #error unsuported architecture #endif abort(); // Should never be reached. This is most likely related to and depends on a real fix for handling signals during stepping outlined in bug #4747 (int3 is a somewhat difficult case though, that probably should be handled independently by special casing since it generates a SIGTRAP which isn't a rt signal, so it doesn't queue multiple and you will only get one). 1) testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(libgcj.so.8rh) at java.lang.Integer.decode(libgcj.so.8rh) at frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints$GoAround.run(TestRunner) 2) testSteppingtestInsertRemove(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(libgcj.so.8rh) at java.lang.Integer.decode(libgcj.so.8rh) at frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints$GoAround.run(TestRunner) 3) testSteppingAddLots(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(libgcj.so.8rh) at java.lang.Integer.decode(libgcj.so.8rh) at frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints$GoAround.run(TestRunner) -- Summary: testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)jav a.lang.NullPointerException Product: frysk Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org BugsThisDependsOn: 4747 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4847 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/4847] testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException 2007-07-26 15:29 [Bug general/4847] New: testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-08-10 11:21 ` mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-15 11:07 ` mark at klomp dot org 2008-04-17 16:36 ` mark at klomp dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-08-10 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: frysk-bugzilla ------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-10 11:21 ------- Marked the following test as unresolved() for now: frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints.testSteppingtestHitAndRun frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints.testSteppingtestInsertRemove frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints.testSteppingAddLots -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4847 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/4847] testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException 2007-07-26 15:29 [Bug general/4847] New: testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-10 11:21 ` [Bug general/4847] testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-08-15 11:07 ` mark at klomp dot org 2008-04-17 16:36 ` mark at klomp dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2007-08-15 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: frysk-bugzilla -- Bug 4847 depends on bug 4747, which changed state. Bug 4747 Summary: frysk.rt.TestUpdatingDisplayValue java.lang.IllegalStateException: Already stepping http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4747 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4847 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/4847] testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException 2007-07-26 15:29 [Bug general/4847] New: testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-10 11:21 ` [Bug general/4847] testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-15 11:07 ` mark at klomp dot org @ 2008-04-17 16:36 ` mark at klomp dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: mark at klomp dot org @ 2008-04-17 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: frysk-bugzilla ------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org 2008-04-17 16:35 ------- Signal handling and stepping works correctly now. But on x86 kernels you will hit bug #6044. commit f3f9eddf68ae48f414d20539f4ed80d897a36c14 Author: Mark Wielaard <mwielaard@redhat.com> Date: Thu Apr 17 18:27:24 2008 +0200 All TestBreakpoint tests should now PASS (except on broken x86 kernels). frysk-core/frysk/proc/ChangeLog 2008-04-17 Mark Wielaard <mwielaard@redhat.com> * TestBreakpoints.java (testSteppingtestHitAndRun): No longer unresolved because of bug #4847, but make unresolvedOnIA32 because of bug #6044. (testSteppingtestInsertRemove): Likewise. (testSteppingAddLots): Likewise. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6044 *** -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4847 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-17 16:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-07-26 15:29 [Bug general/4847] New: testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-10 11:21 ` [Bug general/4847] testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException mark at klomp dot org 2007-08-15 11:07 ` mark at klomp dot org 2008-04-17 16:36 ` mark at klomp dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).