public inbox for frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug general/5527] New: testStepSigReturn(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverInstructionSigReturn)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Wrong signal received: 5
@ 2007-12-29 4:18 cagney at redhat dot com
2007-12-29 5:19 ` [Bug general/5527] " cagney at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: cagney at redhat dot com @ 2007-12-29 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk-bugzilla
For -arch 32:
testStepSigReturn(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverInstructionSigReturn)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
Wrong signal received: 5
at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverInstructionSigReturn.updateSignaled(TestRunner)
at frysk.proc.Task.notifySignaled(TestRunner)
at frysk.proc.live.LinuxTaskState$Running.handleSignaledEvent(TestRunner)
at frysk.proc.live.LinuxTaskState$Stepping.handleSignaledEvent(TestRunner)
at frysk.proc.live.LinuxTaskState$Stepping.handleTrappedEvent(TestRunner)
at frysk.proc.live.LinuxTask.processTrappedEvent(TestRunner)
at frysk.proc.live.LinuxWaitBuilder.stopped(TestRunner)
at frysk.sys.Wait.wait(TestRunner)
at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAll(TestRunner)
at frysk.event.WaitEventLoop.block(TestRunner)
at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(TestRunner)
at frysk.testbed.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
at frysk.testbed.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverInstructionSigReturn.testStepSigReturn(TestRunner)
at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)
the log shows:
FINE: entering peekFully, caret: 0x380, off: 0x0, len: 0x4
28-Dec-07 10:32:19 PM inua.eio.ByteBuffer peekFully
FINE: exiting peekFully
28-Dec-07 10:32:19 PM inua.eio.ByteBuffer peekFully
FINE: entering peekFully, caret: 0x80, off: 0x0, len: 0x4
28-Dec-07 10:32:19 PM inua.eio.ByteBuffer peekFully
FINE: exiting peekFully
28-Dec-07 10:32:19 PM frysk.proc.Task notifyCodeBreakpoint
FINE: {frysk.proc.live.LinuxTask@2fa2d355,pid=14074,tid=14074,state=stepping}
notifyCodeBreakpoint(134,514,034)
28-Dec-07 10:32:19 PM inua.eio.ByteBuffer peekFully
FINE: entering peekFully, caret: 0x80, off: 0x0, len: 0x4
28-Dec-07 10:32:19 PM inua.eio.ByteBuffer peekFully
FINE: exiting peekFully
28-Dec-07 10:32:19 PM frysk.proc.Task getMemory
FINE: {frysk.proc.live.LinuxTask@2fa2d355,pid=14074,tid=14074,state=stepping}
entering get memory frysk.proc.live.LogicalMemoryBuffer@2f89d735
28-Dec-07 10:32:19 PM frysk.proc.Task getMemory
FINE: {frysk.proc.live.LinuxTask@2fa2d355,pid=14074,tid=14074,state=stepping}
exiting get memory frysk.proc.live.LogicalMemoryBuffer@2f89d735
28-Dec-07 10:32:19 PM frysk.proc.live.LinuxTaskState$Stepping handleSignaledEvent
FINE: {frysk.proc.live.LinuxTask@2fa2d355,pid=14074,tid=14074,state=stepping}
handleSignaledEvent, signal: 5
28-Dec-07 10:32:19 PM frysk.proc.live.LinuxTaskState$Running handleSignaledEvent
FINE: {frysk.proc.live.LinuxTask@2fa2d355,pid=14074,tid=14074,state=stepping}
handleSignaledEvent, signal: 5
28-Dec-07 10:32:19 PM frysk.proc.Task notifySignaled
FINE: {frysk.proc.live.LinuxTask@2fa2d355,pid=14074,tid=14074,state=stepping}
notifySignaled(int)
--
notice reasoning that it got a sig-trap for no reason.
machine is amd64 running kernel 2.6.23.9-85.fc8; doesn't occur on intel64
running kernel 2.6.23.1-42.fc8
--
Summary: testStepSigReturn(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverInstruction
SigReturn)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Wrong
signal received: 5
Product: frysk
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: general
AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5527
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/5527] testStepSigReturn(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverInstructionSigReturn)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Wrong signal received: 5
2007-12-29 4:18 [Bug general/5527] New: testStepSigReturn(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverInstructionSigReturn)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Wrong signal received: 5 cagney at redhat dot com
@ 2007-12-29 5:19 ` cagney at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: cagney at redhat dot com @ 2007-12-29 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk-bugzilla
------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com 2007-12-29 05:19 -------
It's a stray SIGTRAP after a sig-return. Why it only appears to occur on amd?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5527
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-29 5:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-29 4:18 [Bug general/5527] New: testStepSigReturn(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverInstructionSigReturn)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Wrong signal received: 5 cagney at redhat dot com
2007-12-29 5:19 ` [Bug general/5527] " cagney at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).