public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/11424] New: Asm broken on IA64 ?
@ 2003-07-03 14:18 wwadge at hobsoft dot com dot mt
2003-07-03 14:22 ` [Bug c/11424] " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-04 5:15 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wwadge at hobsoft dot com dot mt @ 2003-07-03 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
Summary: Asm broken on IA64 ?
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: wwadge at hobsoft dot com dot mt
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
In my .S file, I have the following:
movl r25=(1 << 64) - 1
assembling and objdump'ing gives movl r25=0x0 instead of 0xffffffff as
I'd expect.
I'm running on IA32 and generating code for IA-64.
This problem was not evident in 2.96 (yes from Redhat I know, sorry)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/11424] Asm broken on IA64 ?
2003-07-03 14:18 [Bug c/11424] New: Asm broken on IA64 ? wwadge at hobsoft dot com dot mt
@ 2003-07-03 14:22 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-04 5:15 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-07-03 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-03 14:22 -------
Not a gcc bug but a binutils bug (they control gas, the assembler) report it to them.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/11424] Asm broken on IA64 ?
2003-07-03 14:18 [Bug c/11424] New: Asm broken on IA64 ? wwadge at hobsoft dot com dot mt
2003-07-03 14:22 ` [Bug c/11424] " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-07-04 5:15 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wilson at tuliptree dot org @ 2003-07-04 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11424
------- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2003-07-04 05:15 -------
Subject: Re: New: Asm broken on IA64 ?
wwadge at hobsoft dot com dot mt wrote:
> movl r25=(1 << 64) - 1
This isn't a binutils bug either. Shifting by greater than the size of
int is invalid. Changing this to 1L << 64 doesn't help, because you are
still shifting by greater than the size of long.
Jim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-04 5:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-03 14:18 [Bug c/11424] New: Asm broken on IA64 ? wwadge at hobsoft dot com dot mt
2003-07-03 14:22 ` [Bug c/11424] " pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-04 5:15 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).