[Bug target/4264] [sco3.2v5] native assembler errors for gcc output

[Bug target/4264] [sco3.2v5] native assembler errors for gcc output

[dhazeghi at yahoo dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4264


dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|dhazeghi at yahoo dot com   |


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-07-05 16:39 -------
Just a reminder that this bug is awaiting feedback. Is it possible for you to verify whether gcc 3.3 
still has this problem? Thanks,

[Bug target/4264] [sco3.2v5] native assembler errors for gcc output

[rac at tenzing dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4264



------- Additional Comments From rac at tenzing dot org  2003-07-08 16:58 -------
Subject: Re:  [sco3.2v5] native assembler errors for gcc output

"dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" (gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org) wrote:

>PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4264
>
>dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 CC|dhazeghi at yahoo dot com   |
>
>------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-07-05 16:39 -------
>Just a reminder that this bug is awaiting feedback. Is it possible for you to verify whether gcc 3.3 
>still has this problem? Thanks,
>
>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


Unfortunately I am unable to test at this time.  Since upgrading the OS
from 5.0.6 to 5.0.7,  I am unable to use my existing gcc nor
bootstrap/build a new version.  There is apparently some issue with the
libraries provided with the new version of the SCO OS.  Once this issue
is addressed, I will test and report back.

Thank you.

[Bug target/4264] [sco3.2v5] native assembler errors for gcc output

[dhazeghi at yahoo dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4264


dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jkj at sco dot com


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-08-24 18:09 -------
Kean, I was going to close or suspend this bug (as we cannot verify that it still exists), but would 
like to know if you've seen this before, or if you believe this can be closed? Thanks.

[Bug target/4264] [sco3.2v5] native assembler errors for gcc output

[rac at tenzing dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4264



------- Additional Comments From rac at tenzing dot org  2003-08-24 23:15 -------
Subject: Re:  [sco3.2v5] native assembler errors for gcc output

"dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" (gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org) wrote:

>PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4264
>
>dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 CC|                            |jkj at sco dot com
>
>------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-08-24 18:09 -------
>Kean, I was going to close or suspend this bug (as we cannot verify that it still exists), but would 
>like to know if you've seen this before, or if you believe this can be closed? Thanks.
>
>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

I'm on OSR507, and as far as I know, gcc 2.95.3 is the only gcc which
runs on thsi version.  My original report was against gcc 3.0.1, but I
could test this using 2.95.3 if it would be interesting to anyone.
Should I?

Roger

[Bug target/4264] [sco3.2v5] native assembler errors for gcc output

[dhazeghi at yahoo dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4264



------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-08-25 00:00 -------
Well, at this point 2.95.3 is so old that this question's almost academic. It would be much more 
helpful if you could test gcc 3.3.1. However, if you cannot, knowing about 2.95.3 will at least 
provide another data point.

[Bug target/4264] [sco3.2v5] native assembler errors for gcc output

[rac at tenzing dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4264



------- Additional Comments From rac at tenzing dot org  2003-08-25 15:53 -------
Subject: Re:  [sco3.2v5] native assembler errors for gcc output

"dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" (gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org) wrote:

>PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4264
>
>------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2003-08-25 00:00 -------
>Well, at this point 2.95.3 is so old that this question's almost academic. It would be much more 
>helpful if you could test gcc 3.3.1. However, if you cannot, knowing about 2.95.3 will at least 
>provide another data point.

I will try to test it this week.

[Bug target/4264] [sco3.2v5] native assembler errors for gcc output

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4264


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-09-03 19:35 -------
No feedback in 3 months.