public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3
@ 2003-07-02 12:54 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
  2003-07-02 12:55 ` [Bug optimization/11403] " martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                   ` (10 more replies)
  0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de @ 2003-07-02 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403

           Summary: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when
                    compiling with -O3
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu

The ICE occurs when compiling the attached testcase using -O3.
Curiously, the header file <iostream> must be included to reproduce the ICE,
although none of its functionality is used.

The ICE is most likely caused by the new unit-at-a-time code, because it goes
away when -fno-unit-at-a-time is specified.

This is a regression grom gcc-3.3.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/11403] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3
  2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
@ 2003-07-02 12:55 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
  2003-07-02 12:56 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de @ 2003-07-02 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403



------- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de  2003-07-02 12:55 -------
Created an attachment (id=4326)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4326&action=view)
A testcase to reproduce the ICE


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/11403] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3
  2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
  2003-07-02 12:55 ` [Bug optimization/11403] " martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
@ 2003-07-02 12:56 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
  2003-07-02 14:36 ` [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem) bangerth at dealii dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de @ 2003-07-02 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403



------- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de  2003-07-02 12:56 -------
compiler output:

~/data/planck/LevelS/cxxmod>g++ -v -O3 -c bugrep.ii
Reading specs from /afs/mpa/data/martin/ugcc/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4/specs
Configured with: /scratch/gcc/configure --prefix=/afs/mpa/data/martin/ugcc
--enable-languages=c++ --enable-namespaces
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4 20030702 (experimental)
 /afs/mpa/data/martin/ugcc/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4/cc1plus
-fpreprocessed bugrep.ii -quiet -dumpbase bugrep.ii -mtune=pentiumpro -auxbase
bugrep -O3 -version -o /tmp/ccpruH8T.s
GNU C++ version 3.4 20030702 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
        compiled by GNU C version 3.4 20030702 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=64 --param ggc-min-heapsize=64464
bugrep.cc: In function `void bla(bool)':
bugrep.cc:20:   instantiated from `T& arr<T>::operator[](int) [with T = double]'
bugrep.cc:20:   instantiated from here
bugrep.cc:20: internal compiler error: in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)
  2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
  2003-07-02 12:55 ` [Bug optimization/11403] " martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
  2003-07-02 12:56 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
@ 2003-07-02 14:36 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  2003-07-02 14:40 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2003-07-02 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403


bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jh at suse dot cz
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-07-02 14:36:17
               date|                            |
            Summary|ICE in cgraph_remove_edge,  |[3.4 regression] ICE in
                   |at cgraph.c:182 when        |cgraph_remove_edge with -O3
                   |compiling with -O3          |(unit-at-a-time problem)


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-07-02 14:36 -------
Indeed. Using -O3 -fno-unit-at-a-time makes the ICE go away.

Surprisingly, I don't need the include. Here's my minimal testcase:
----------------------------------
struct S {
    double *d;
    double &operator[] (int n) {return d[n];}
};

void foo (bool b) {
  S s;
  s[3] = b ? 1. : 2.;
}
-----------------------------------

tmp/gg> ../build-gcc/gcc-install/bin/c++ -c -O3 x.ii
<internal>: In function `void foo(bool)':
<internal>:8: internal compiler error: in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

tmp/gg> ../build-gcc/gcc-install/bin/c++ -c -O3 x.ii -fno-unit-at-a-time

This is with a snapshot built tonight. Jan, would you mind taking a look?

W.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)
  2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-02 14:36 ` [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem) bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2003-07-02 14:40 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  2003-07-02 15:34 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-07-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403



------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-02 14:40 -------
It does not fail on 20030701, I think this is caused by this patch:
Wed Jul  2 00:36:48 CEST 2003  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz>

        * decl2.c (defer_fn): Set DECL_DEFER_OUTPUT.
        (finish-file): Do not process function with DECL_DEFER_OUTPUT clear;
        clear DECL_DEFER_OUTPUT once function is processed; avoid flags
        massaging.

        * cp-tree.h (DECL_NEEDED_P): Support unit-at-a-time
        (expand_or_defer_fn): Declare.
        (lower_function): Declare.
        * decl.c (start_cleanup_fn): Use expand_or_defer_fn.
        * decl2.c: Include cgraph.h and varpool.h
        (maybe_emit_vtables):  Make explicit instantations as needed.
        (mark_member_pointers, lower_function): New functions.
        (finish_file): Do unit-at-a-time.
        * method.c (synthesize_method): Use expand_or_defer_fn.
        * optimize.c (maybe_clone_body): Use expand_or_defer_fn.
        * parser.c (cp_parser_function_definition_after_decl): Use
        expand_or_defer_fn.
        * pt.c (instantiate_decl): Likewise.
        * semantics.c: Include cgraph.h
        (expand_or_defer_fn): Break out from ...
        (expand_body): ... here; deal with unit-at-a-time.
        * cp-lang.c (LANG_HOOKS_CALLGRAPH_EXPAND_FUNCTION,
        LANG_HOOKS_CALLGRAPH_LOWER_FUNCTION): Define.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)
  2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-02 14:40 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-07-02 15:34 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  2003-07-02 17:38 ` jh at suse dot cz
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2003-07-02 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403



------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-07-02 15:34 -------
The compiler I used (and which shows the ICE) has this signature:

tmp/gg> ../build-gcc/gcc-install/bin/c++ -v
Reading specs from
/homes/csm2/bangerth/tmp/build-gcc/gcc-install/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4/specs
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--prefix=/ticam/bangerth/tmp/build-gcc/gcc-install --disable-checking
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4 20030702 (experimental)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)
  2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-02 15:34 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2003-07-02 17:38 ` jh at suse dot cz
  2003-07-02 22:27 ` jh at suse dot cz
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jh at suse dot cz @ 2003-07-02 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403



------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz  2003-07-02 17:38 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)

> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403
> 
> 
> bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |jh at suse dot cz
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
>      Ever Confirmed|                            |1
>    Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-07-02 14:36:17
>                date|                            |
>             Summary|ICE in cgraph_remove_edge,  |[3.4 regression] ICE in
>                    |at cgraph.c:182 when        |cgraph_remove_edge with -O3
>                    |compiling with -O3          |(unit-at-a-time problem)
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-07-02 14:36 -------
> Indeed. Using -O3 -fno-unit-at-a-time makes the ICE go away.
> 
> Surprisingly, I don't need the include. Here's my minimal testcase:
> ----------------------------------
> struct S {
>     double *d;
>     double &operator[] (int n) {return d[n];}
> };
> 
> void foo (bool b) {
>   S s;
>   s[3] = b ? 1. : 2.;
> }
> -----------------------------------
> 
> tmp/gg> ../build-gcc/gcc-install/bin/c++ -c -O3 x.ii
> <internal>: In function `void foo(bool)':
> <internal>:8: internal compiler error: in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> 
> tmp/gg> ../build-gcc/gcc-install/bin/c++ -c -O3 x.ii -fno-unit-at-a-time
> 
> This is with a snapshot built tonight. Jan, would you mind taking a look?

Sure, having such a sweet testcase should make it easy.
Thanks!

Honza
> 
> W.
> 
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)
  2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-02 17:38 ` jh at suse dot cz
@ 2003-07-02 22:27 ` jh at suse dot cz
  2003-07-03  8:26 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jh at suse dot cz @ 2003-07-02 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403



------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz  2003-07-02 22:27 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)

> Indeed. Using -O3 -fno-unit-at-a-time makes the ICE go away.
> 
> Surprisingly, I don't need the include. Here's my minimal testcase:
> ----------------------------------
> struct S {
>     double *d;
>     double &operator[] (int n) {return d[n];}
> };
> 
> void foo (bool b) {
>   S s;
>   s[3] = b ? 1. : 2.;
> }
> -----------------------------------

Hi,
Interesting :).  
The problem is that the function body does contain 3 call_exprs, while
first two are shared.  We create callgraph edges by
walk_tree_without_duplicates so we get only two edges instead of three.
Tree inliner inline first two calls, but also forgets about the third
and we get linker failure.

I assume that the rationale why walk_tree was originally replaced by
walk_tree_without_duplicates is right and thus this is latent bug in C++
frontend.  It is fixed by the attached patch (the lhs is used again
immediately afterwards to build the COND_EXPR)  For the arms of
COND_EXPRs the sharing is already cared for, but it may happen in
between the conditional and first operand.

Regtested, bootstrapped.  OK, together with the testcase?
Where noncompilation testcases should be put in G++ testsuite?

Thu Jul  3 00:24:38 CEST 2003  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz>
	* typeck.c (build_modify_expr): Avoid invalid sharing of CALL_EXPRS.
Index: typeck.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/typeck.c,v
retrieving revision 1.470
diff -c -3 -p -r1.470 typeck.c
*** typeck.c	2 Jul 2003 09:36:17 -0000	1.470
--- typeck.c	2 Jul 2003 22:23:24 -0000
*************** build_modify_expr (tree lhs, enum tree_c
*** 5591,5597 ****
  
        if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (lhs))
  	cond = build_compound_expr (tree_cons
! 				    (NULL_TREE, lhs,
  				     build_tree_list (NULL_TREE, cond)));
  
        /* Cannot have two identical lhs on this one tree (result) as preexpand
--- 5591,5597 ----
  
        if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (lhs))
  	cond = build_compound_expr (tree_cons
! 				    (NULL_TREE, break_out_calls (lhs),
  				     build_tree_list (NULL_TREE, cond)));
  
        /* Cannot have two identical lhs on this one tree (result) as preexpand


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)
  2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-02 22:27 ` jh at suse dot cz
@ 2003-07-03  8:26 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
  2003-07-05 19:20 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de @ 2003-07-03  8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403



------- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de  2003-07-03 08:26 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge
 with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)

jh at suse dot cz wrote:

> Regtested, bootstrapped.  OK, together with the testcase?
> Where noncompilation testcases should be put in G++ testsuite?

Your patch fixes the problem for me, thanks!

Cheers,
   Martin


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)
  2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-03  8:26 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
@ 2003-07-05 19:20 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-07-05 21:06 ` jh at suse dot cz
  2003-07-15 14:45 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-05 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403



------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-07-05 19:20 -------
I see that the patch hasn't been committed to mainline.

Could it be, so that we could close this?  Or is something else holding this up?

--Nathanael


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)
  2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-05 19:20 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-05 21:06 ` jh at suse dot cz
  2003-07-15 14:45 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jh at suse dot cz @ 2003-07-05 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403



------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz  2003-07-05 21:05 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)

> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-07-05 19:20 -------
> I see that the patch hasn't been committed to mainline.
> 
> Could it be, so that we could close this?  Or is something else holding this up?

I would preffer to keep the bug open until the patch is approved,
otherwise there is a chance that it will get lost.

Honza
> 
> --Nathanael
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem)
  2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-07-05 21:06 ` jh at suse dot cz
@ 2003-07-15 14:45 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-07-15 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11403


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-15 14:45 -------
This no longer ICEs on the mainline (20030714) so closing as fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-15 14:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-02 12:54 [Bug optimization/11403] New: ICE in cgraph_remove_edge, at cgraph.c:182 when compiling with -O3 martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2003-07-02 12:55 ` [Bug optimization/11403] " martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2003-07-02 12:56 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2003-07-02 14:36 ` [Bug optimization/11403] [3.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_remove_edge with -O3 (unit-at-a-time problem) bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-07-02 14:40 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-02 15:34 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2003-07-02 17:38 ` jh at suse dot cz
2003-07-02 22:27 ` jh at suse dot cz
2003-07-03  8:26 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2003-07-05 19:20 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-05 21:06 ` jh at suse dot cz
2003-07-15 14:45 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).