public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation
@ 2003-10-22 15:45 aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-22 15:52 ` [Bug java/12725] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (21 more replies)
  0 siblings, 22 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-22 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725

           Summary: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy
                    specifciation
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: java
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org

The Java Language Standard, Second Edition, Binary Compatibility spec has a
number of requirements to which gcj does not conform.

http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/binaryComp.doc.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-22 15:52 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-23  1:07 ` [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
                   ` (20 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-22 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-10-22 15:45:36
               date|                            |


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-22 15:52 ` [Bug java/12725] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-23  1:07 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
  2003-10-24 13:17 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (19 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz @ 2003-10-23  1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-22 15:52 ` [Bug java/12725] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-23  1:07 ` [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
@ 2003-10-24 13:17 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-24 13:18 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-24 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725



------- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-10-24 13:14 -------
The big patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-10/msg02003.html addreses
much of this issue, but there are still some problems, as that posting indicates.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-24 13:17 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-24 13:18 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-24 13:20 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-24 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |12755
              nThis|                            |


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-24 13:18 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-24 13:20 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-24 13:22 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-24 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |12756
              nThis|                            |


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-24 13:20 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-24 13:22 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-24 13:39 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-24 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |12758


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-24 13:39 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-24 13:39 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-24 13:47 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-24 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |12759
              nThis|                            |


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-24 13:22 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-24 13:39 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-24 13:39 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-24 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|enhancement                 |normal


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-24 13:39 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-24 13:47 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-10-25  6:49 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-24 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |12760


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-24 13:47 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-25  6:49 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
  2004-04-20  7:45 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz @ 2003-10-25  6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |12772


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-10-25  6:49 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
@ 2004-04-20  7:45 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-05-10  5:04 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-20  7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-20 05:26 -------
I've added #12957 as a dependency as fixing this may involve
changing the interface to _Jv_GetJNIEnvNewFrame, and hence
impacts binary compatibility.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |12957


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-04-20  7:45 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-10  5:04 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-07-21 16:19 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-10  5:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |15363


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-05-10  5:04 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-21 16:19 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-09-02 13:25 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-21 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 12725 depends on bug 15650, which changed state.

Bug 15650 Summary: [BC]: definite assignment checking is broken for static fields
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15650

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-07-21 16:19 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-02 13:25 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-09-23 16:53 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-02 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 12725 depends on bug 15321, which changed state.

Bug 15321 Summary: Binary Compatibility: gcj reads dependent classes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15321

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-09-02 13:25 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-23 16:53 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-13 19:31 ` [Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-23 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 12725 depends on bug 12755, which changed state.

Bug 12755 Summary: Binary Compatibility: Resolving static methods and classes is not thread safe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12755

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-09-23 16:53 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-13 19:31 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-20 16:00 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-13 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |17978


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-10-13 19:31 ` [Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-20 16:00 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-20 16:00 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-20 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 12725 depends on bug 12760, which changed state.

Bug 12760 Summary: Binary Compatibility: moving a method into a superinterface
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12760

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-10-20 16:00 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-20 16:00 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-10 19:41 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-20 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 12725 depends on bug 13606, which changed state.

Bug 13606 Summary: need extra runtime verification of compiled code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13606

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-10-20 16:00 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-10 19:41 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-14 13:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-10 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 12725 depends on bug 17738, which changed state.

Bug 17738 Summary: Binary Compatibility: _Jv_FindClassInCache
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17738

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-10 19:41 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-14 13:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-10 21:03 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-08 19:08 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-14 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 12725 depends on bug 12957, which changed state.

Bug 12957 Summary: JNI Performance Issues
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12957

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (19 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-14 13:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-10 21:03 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-08 19:08 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-10 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 12725 depends on bug 19285, which changed state.

Bug 19285 Summary: Interfaces not initialized by static field access
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19285

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification
  2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (20 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-05-10 21:03 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-08 19:08 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-08 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |22377


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-08 19:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-22 15:45 [Bug java/12725] New: gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibiliy specifciation aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-22 15:52 ` [Bug java/12725] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-23  1:07 ` [Bug java/12725] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
2003-10-24 13:17 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 13:18 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 13:20 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 13:22 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 13:39 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 13:39 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 13:47 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-25  6:49 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
2004-04-20  7:45 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-10  5:04 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-21 16:19 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-02 13:25 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-23 16:53 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-13 19:31 ` [Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 16:00 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 16:00 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-10 19:41 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-14 13:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-10 21:03 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-08 19:08 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).