public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/12759] New: BInary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled
@ 2003-10-24 13:41 aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 16:48 ` [Bug java/12759] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-24 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12759
Summary: BInary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
BugsThisDependsOn: 12725
no-assume-compiled is undocumented and probably broken, but some software,
particularly Eclipse, relies on it. When indirect-dispatch works well enough for
Eclipse we should rip out no-assume-compiled.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12759] BInary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled
2003-10-24 13:41 [Bug java/12759] New: BInary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-24 16:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 19:09 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-24 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12759
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-10-24 16:48:18
date| |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12759] BInary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled
2003-10-24 13:41 [Bug java/12759] New: BInary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 16:48 ` [Bug java/12759] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-24 19:09 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-25 3:48 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
2004-10-20 16:02 ` [Bug java/12759] Binary " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-10-24 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12759
------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-24 19:09 -------
I wonder if we should instead keep the no-assume-compiled
command-line processing, and reuse it to decide when
to generate more tightly bound code and when to generate
indirect-dispatch code.
The internal "no-assume-compiled ABI" should definitely be
removed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12759] BInary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled
2003-10-24 13:41 [Bug java/12759] New: BInary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 16:48 ` [Bug java/12759] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 19:09 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-10-25 3:48 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
2004-10-20 16:02 ` [Bug java/12759] Binary " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz @ 2003-10-25 3:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12759
------- Additional Comments From bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz 2003-10-25 03:40 -------
I was thinking the same thing. We could perhaps think of a better name for it
-fassume-local ?
-fassume-same-binary ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12759] Binary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled
2003-10-24 13:41 [Bug java/12759] New: BInary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-25 3:48 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
@ 2004-10-20 16:02 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-20 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-20 16:02 -------
This is fairly low priority because it doesn't really affect anything.
However, removing no-assume-compiled could cause considerable lossage.
For the time being, we could simply remove the command line option.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |minor
Last reconfirmed|2004-08-09 02:01:07 |2004-10-20 16:02:51
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12759
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-20 16:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-24 13:41 [Bug java/12759] New: BInary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 16:48 ` [Bug java/12759] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-24 19:09 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-25 3:48 ` bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz
2004-10-20 16:02 ` [Bug java/12759] Binary " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).